Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SEALs killed in Afghan crash were answering call for help

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 12:36 PM
Original message
SEALs killed in Afghan crash were answering call for help
Source: LAT

Reporting from Kabul, Afghanistan –—
New details emerged Monday about the devastating helicopter crash that killed 30 U.S. service members including at least 22 elite Navy SEALs.

The chopper, carrying the SEALs as well as seven Afghan commandos and other U.S. troops, was downed early Saturday as it arrived to answer a call for help from another elite force, the Western military said publicly for the first time.

Previous reports had been contradictory about whether the Chinook helicopter carrying the SEALs was arriving or departing the scene in Afghanistan's Wardak province. The chopper was apparently downed by insurgent fire.

A statement from NATO's International Security Assistance Force, the first detailed public accounting of the incident, said the operation "began as a security search for a Taliban leader responsible for insurgent operations in the nearby Tangi Valley."


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-0809-afghan-helicopter-20110809,0,2270664.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. What to believe? I also read today that they were set up......
to be ambushed. Evidently given false information about a Taliban meeting taking place to draw them in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Avoiding being predictable is always a problem in war. nt
Edited on Mon Aug-08-11 12:48 PM by bemildred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here it is.
I have become so cynical it a shame. When I heard rescue mission I only though of PsyOps and putting out a story that would tug heart strings rather than just the plain truth.
http://news.yahoo.com/us-helicopter-shot-down-taliban-trap-afghan-official-070456126.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. One of the Navy Seal's fathers gave his version of "the truth" re: our being there
Edited on Mon Aug-08-11 04:45 PM by lebkuchen
in the first place. I wasn't sure if he were more upset over this son's death or with the "higher ups" not saying/doing the right thing in this situation. He seemed very preachy about staying in Afghanistan even after losing his son. We heard a lot of similar parent comments when their soldier-children were dying in Iraq. The exception was Pat Tillman's parents (Pat having died in Afgahnistan). Anyway, this interview troubled me.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44056945/ns/today-today_people/t/navy-seals-widow-we-were-blessed-be-together/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. At the link, I saw comments from his widow and his mom, not from the father.
However, I sometimes get the feeling in general that we are witnessing the rise within our militry of some unhealthy hybrid cult, a combination of nouveau fundamentalism, unquestioning nationalism, and something else that I cannot quite put my finger on. And I think it is passed down from the top because there is a uniformity to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tawadi Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. No media coverage allowed at Dover
Families have no say in the matter. Just reported on CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muskypundit Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. How very junioresqu of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. They say the remains have not been identified yet. In that case, wouldn't you need unanimous
consent for any filming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tawadi Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Sounds like they allowed some media to be present today
Yesterday it sounded like the transport of the soldiers' remains would be a total media blackout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheLastMohican Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Classic cover-up
After the farcical death of "Bin Laden". Did this guy even exist?
They mop out any unwanted witnesses. Can you believe that the best of the best fly in a huge-arse heli together which can be easily shot down by anybody hiding in the multiple caves in Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm guessing that, being in the military, they follow orders. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hasso Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You're joking, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You categorically deny it?
Has anything like this ever happened in America's history? Has there ever been any disinformation on the part of our government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hasso Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. You jump to conclusions
"Has there ever been any disinformation on the part of our government?"

Of course. But this isn't the Reagan Administration. Geez. Why would they off all those guys? Give a motive, or put on your tinfoil hat and shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I only asked a question to consider
Your snarky answer speaks volumes about you. Now you are cordially invited to stuff that "tin foil hat" up your... never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hasso Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. tell me this is a level
I thought only tea-bagging hobbits went off on weird conspiratorial $hit like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. so show the evidence that THIS is disinformation.
take your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I'm guessing you would rather jump to conclusions
rather than consider questions. As in, "Is this scenario possibly true?" Since neither of us have any evidence concerning this event, the question is a fair one. But, I don't blame you for lack of critical thinking skills.

And, I'm not waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. During the supposed Bin Laden raid they used a unknown stealth Black Hawk

So no more of them around ?

Mission helo was secret stealth Black Hawk

By Sean D. Naylor - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday May 4, 2011 18:08:39 EDT

The helicopters that flew the Navy SEALs on the mission to kill Osama bin Laden were a radar-evading variant of the special operations MH-60 Black Hawk, according to a retired special operations aviator.

The helicopter’s low-observable technology is similar to that of the F-117 Stealth Fighter the retired special operations aviator said. “It really didn’t look like a traditional Black Hawk,” he said. It had “hard edges, sort of like an … F-117, you know how they have those distinctive edges and angles — that’s what they had on this one


http://www.armytimes.com/news/2011/05/army-mission-helocopter-was-secret-stealth-black-hawk-050411/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjl148 Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. CH-47
Yes, the Black Hawk is remarkable and vital for special ops where you need stealth. The SEALS didn't seem to be on a special ops - it was already a hot zone and no one needed to sneak in. The bad guys know there will be reinforcements coming. Standard issue chopper for this is often the Chinook (CH-47), especially if you want to get a lot of people into the area quickly. I doubt if SEALS use Chinooks very often but sometimes you use what you have available, especially if you have to move fast as you would in a rescue mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. classic conspiracy nonsense
make up a whole bunch of stuff with no evidence whatsoever of any of your assertions and hope that some idiot runs with it.
bravo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. I find it quite strange that a relief element would fly into a hot LZ with
a Chinook Chopper.. Chinooks are troop carriers and not assault helicopters.. It makes no sense to me at all.. If these guys were going to air assault into the frey to relieve Rangers that were pinned down, there would be guns blazing while the assault ships did their thing... Doesn't sound right to me, but I have not been in such a situation for more than forty years..:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Chinooks have the best performance in high hot environments.
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 03:21 PM by hack89
they are commonly used in Afghanistan for assaults because in the mountains in the summers they have a speed and power advantage over Blackhawks.

They were also commonly used for assaults in Iraq - here is a story from 2008:

http://www.stripes.com/news/chinooks-take-on-more-air-assaults-1.75685

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Good info, hack89
Thanks for posting.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I am from a different era.
We flew old jalopies into battle. The D model Huey. Eighty miles per hour, pedal to the metal. The H models were quite a bit faster and more powerful but we carried the guns...We operated in pretty dense jungle though with small LZs usually nothing more than bomb craters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unionworks Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. this was retaliation
for killing bin laden, and it sure looks like it was a trap. Solution? Pull our forces out of the area where the talibastards are operating and as a goodbye present, call in the B-52s and carpet bomb until the whole fucking place is below sea level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC