Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDIC backs barring banks from trading for own gain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 12:23 PM
Original message
FDIC backs barring banks from trading for own gain
Source: AP

ASSOCIATED PRESS Wednesday October 12, 2011 5:47 AM

WASHINGTON — Banks would be barred from trading for their own profit instead of their clients’ under a rule federal regulators proposed yesterday.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. backed the draft rule on a 3-0 vote. The ban on so-called proprietary trading was required under the financial overhaul law.

Critics dismissed the effort as weak and marred by loopholes. And banks said that it would hurt the economy. The FDIC’s vote puts the rule out for public comment.

The Federal Reserve has also approved a draft of the proposal, called the Volcker Rule after former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker.

Read more: http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/business/2011/10/12/fdic-backs-barring-banks-from-trading-for-own-gain.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChandlerJr Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was at the heart of the Glass-Steagall
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 12:36 PM by ChandlerJr
regulations repealed in 1999. A wall between commercial banks and investment banks preventing speculating with depositors money.

Much of the current economic mess would have been prevented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a small step in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. I about barfed when I heard the people on NPR calling it "the banks money".
Silly me, I thought it was the depositors money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's the depositors' money, but it is insured by the people -- by the FDIC.
Bankers are clever enough to take the profits from very risky, even dishonest trading and then leave a bankrupt institution for the FDIC to bail out.

I'm not saying that has happened. I'm not well enough informed to know whether that has happened. But it is certainly possible under the rules that now exist if my understanding is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree, and good to see the vote was 3-0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is basic. We can't have a fair or trustworthy or honest
investment sector if we don't bar banks from gambling with their money.

And bankers' personal investments should be reported -- not openly published -- but reported to the FDIC to insure that bankers as individuals are not manipulating markets or doing what amounts to insider trading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick and Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. In the early 1990s MBA schools started to teach ceos to think of their labour, the government,
their customers, etc. as competition that should be crushed. And now the middle class has been crushed by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. since the banks say it would hurt the economy, it must be good. The banksters have no credibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC