Carl Levin bucks White House on detainees

Source: Politico


The liberal Michigan Democrat — who voted against the Iraq War in 2002 and typically votes with his party nine out of 10 times — rejected call after call by senior Obama administration officials to overhaul how his defense bill handles the treatment of suspected terrorists.



Setting up a high-stakes showdown, Levin teamed up with Obama’s 2008 rival, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), to push a $662 billion defense bill over the White House’s veto threat because of a highly contentious provision that could allow the military to indefinitely imprison suspected terrorists.

The Senate overwhelmingly passed the defense bill Thursday night, 93-7, after Levin agreed with critics to include language ensuring that nothing in the bill would affect current law for those arrested in the United States. But the administration’s most significant concerns — that the bill could impede sensitive intelligence investigations — don’t appear to be fully resolved, potentially escalating tensions between the White House and Capitol Hill.

At the center of the fight has been Levin, a leading defense voice in the Democratic Party whose defection gave powerful election-year ammunition for Republicans to attack the White House on national security, helped attract other Democratic defectors and could end up as a political embarrassment for the president if he’s forced to sign legislation despite his objections.




Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69585.html

---

What scared Carl Levin so badly that he wants to lock up Americans?

I see Sen. Levin pretty regularly. I'll be asking him about this in person as soon as I can see him.

Julie

I'm sure Carl's always hanging around the office.....wait, no they are never in their office! You call office, you talk to aide. Period. You go see him in person, you talk to him directly.

Julie

and talk to his aide. I am sure you will get an earful of why Levin has decided to take his position.

I've been in politics a long time here in MI. I know his aides, they are not who I want to talk to.

I want to hear it from the man, face to face, directly. And I will write it down as he speaks, letting him know there are many awaiting his answer and I will be sure to pass it on.

I have long appreciated Carl and have many chats with him. He's a plain-spoken guy and will explain his actions. I may not get to see him before next month but see him I will and DU will get a full report.

Julie

posting or signing an online petition, which, in my book is not taking action in the real world. They won't even make a $5 donation, volunteer or even write a letter or make a call.

If you care enough about something to get hold of a politician in the flesh and make him explain himself, well, heaps of good on you for that.

Many years ago DU inspired me actually. Done many fundraisers, chaired parties, built membership, worked at the state level and just everything you can think of. I really enjoy talking with Levin, he's a tell it like it is kind of guy. he comes here every January for a thing we do, if I don't see him before that I'll talk to him then. I may save the question on this issue for the big Q&A so all hear question and answer (and ask follow-ups!). Wouldn't be the first time we little people have worked in tandem to get through answers to complex issues~~for the benefit of all to hear!

Julie

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

But how in the world do we have so many who voted for this...

Carl Levin has been in the Senate since 1978. He has been a reliable liberal on so many fronts it's not funny. I have talked to him countless times, he is very smart and usually very liberal.

But yeah, fuck that, he needs to go. Of course we have no one in MI who we could easily replace him with....and he has been unassailable at the ballot box....but hey, we don't like this thing he did so fuck that! Let the seat go to the R's if need be. He has annoyed me he must go!!1!

I've known four year olds who can think bigger picture than that which your post reveals.

Julie

Better lock them up!

but don't let that bother you. it doesn't bother the posters above.

detention of people INCLUDING AMERICANS that just passed the senate.

Maybe that's your idea of a 'good guy' but to me that is the very definition of a FUCKER. Rant at me all you want but he's a weasily little fucker that needs to go. Since when does being there since forever mean anything? He's ready to put our own in prison forever for fake security and if you don't think a president won't abuse that and put protesters in prison you haven't been paying attention.

so, why when I called his office, one of his aides basically was an arsehole and kept drilling me on where did I hear there was no WMDs. Or was he against it before he was for it? Was it all just kabuki?

To me, he's looking like a chameleon.

story to the move. Possibly a way to get the defense allocation scaled back? If Obama vetoes it, they'll have to go back to the drawing board on the bill.

He's only fought the good fight since 1978, that slacking mother-fucker!

My gawd I've never seen so many people willing to throw in the towel at the slightest thing no matter how many decades of good service! Ya'll remind me of the corporate bosses we all supposedly hate.

Julie

side too. If you know him so well, then why don't you contact him before January because by then it'll be too late.

Not the solution.

imho

"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where
the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery..." ~Frank Zappa

- The ''law of diminishing returns'' is the only law a corporate person obeys......







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXsJNQii7Yo&feature=colike">Meanwhile, America shops for bargains......

:wtf:

He's the president, the Constitution gives him the power to veto bad legislation. The only thing that would "force" him to do this is his own inability to take a stand the Republicans won't like.

will surely have been involved.

NT!

He's a bigot too.

The information they have seen, and not
acted upon, has made them complicit.

That's the way it works.

No different than good people not standing up to
leaders like Saddam for fear of reprisal or banishment.

You do nothing, you are an accomplice.

And the fear is well-founded.

Do I have the power to change Carl Levin's mind, short of violence? If so, tell me how. They don't even take calls or emails from people who are not in their states (or for the House, their district).

ETA: I agree with your general principle, but, when used in certain ways, it is just another way to blame the victims.

Had you been given information and
been unwilling or unable to act upon
it due to the cloud of war, you would
have been drawn into complicity as well.