Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High court to hear suit over Cheney event arrest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 11:50 AM
Original message
High court to hear suit over Cheney event arrest
Source: AP

By MARK SHERMAN – 1 hr 11 mins ago

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear an appeal from Secret Service agents who say they should be shielded from a lawsuit over their arrest of a Colorado man who confronted Vice President Dick Cheney.

The justices will review a federal appeals court decision to allow Steven Howards of Golden, Colo., to pursue his claim that the arrest violated his free speech rights. Howards was detained by Cheney's security detail in 2006 after he told Cheney of his opposition to the war in Iraq.

Howards also touched Cheney on the shoulder, then denied doing so under questioning. Appellate judges in Denver said the inconsistency gave the agents reason to arrest Howards.

Even so, the appeals court said Howards could sue the agents for violating his rights — an unusual twist that the agents and the Obama administration said conflicts with other appeals court decisions and previous high court rulings in similar cases.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111205/ap_on_go_su_co/us_supreme_court_secret_service_cheney_lawsuit
Refresh | +12 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. OMG! He touched the dickster's shoulder!!!!!
Yeah, arrest was probably a bit of an overreaction. Lucky Dick didn't shoot him in the face - wait, that's for his friends.

Nice to see at least one court seems to have read the Constitution and found nothing to indicate our supreme overlords are exempt from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They will get their orders soon. And all will be forgotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, that Obama administration,
"the appeals court said Howards could sue the agents for violating his rights — an unusual twist that the agents and the Obama administration said conflicts with other appeals court decisions and previous high court rulings in similar cases."

You never know which of the former bushes he's going to defend next.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't see this as having anything to do with Obama;
The issue is from when Cheney was in office. It rests upon what the Secret Service overheard and what Cheney told them, that he was touched. However, the first is a right to comment and the second is he said/a scum bag said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Kinda silly imo if you are expecting the government to not defend itself in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Phoney Assult Charge
Or was he charged with assult? Later it said harrassment charges were dropped. In reading the article the arrest did not happen because of the alleged shoulder touch. It happened when agents had second thoughs and aggressively questioned Howard after Cheney had left the area. Also, this was an event where people were lining up to speak with Cheney. It's likely that other people touched Cheney as well as that is the nature of these meet and greet events and is why there was no initial reaction to Howard. The only thing that is different here is that Howard was an opponent rather than a supporter. In that regard this is a 1st Amendment issue. That said, I expect the Secret Service agents to be let off the hook even though they handled this very poorly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rbixby Donating Member (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. First time someone touched Cheney that he didn't have to force to
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC