Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WMD hunters ambushed in Baghdad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 05:41 PM
Original message
WMD hunters ambushed in Baghdad
WMD hunters ambushed in Baghdad
By P. Mitchell Prothero
Published 4/26/2004 1:32 PM


BAGHDAD, Iraq, April 26 (UPI) -- An explosion that killed al least three U.S. personnel in Baghdad was an ambush of a top-secret unit detailed to search for weapons of mass destruction, United Press International has confirmed.

The military initially claimed that a detail of U.S. Army soldiers were about to raid a suspected bomb making factory when two were killed after an explosion. Several Iraqis in the area at the time told UPI that the building exploded when the soldiers tried to enter the house.

Although coalition spokesman Maj. Gen. Mark Kimmitt admitted that the owner of the home "was suspected of supplying chemical agents," he refused to confirm that the troops belonged to the top secret Iraq Survey Group, a task force of Central Intelligence Agency, Special Forces soldiers and other biological, chemical and nuclear weapons experts.

Kimmett would only say that, "The inspection was by a number of coalition forces."

But at the scene of the blast in Baghdad's Waziriya district -- which destroyed four military Humvee vehicles -- UPI witnessed clear evidence that the troops belonged to the ISG, including credentials looted from the vehicles by local Iraqi youth.

~snip~
more: http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040426-012022-4432

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. But shouldn't have been a Mushroom Cloud?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah right. All this time and they are still looking in Bagdad.
Bull Manure!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. perhaps planting evidence?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Perhaps.
Also when I read this story posted from Al Jazeera this morning it had the deaths at 12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. If they were planting chem weapons, then they would have been released
What's really bad is how loose security is, this event was more than likely leaked days ago allowing perps to rig the place to blow up.

Bad bad news for our guys over there, they're being ratted out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. were they deLivering the chemicaLs to pLant
and had a LittLe accident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenleaf Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yes
it does seem strange , as someone pointed out on another thread, that the vehicles were backed up to the building. Making a delivery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestMomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. The longer we stay in Iraq, the more vulnerable we seem
Or so it seems to me.

When everyday there are reports of successful ambushes like this, I think it just helps to convince people of Iraq that maybe we're not that tough and I don't think that's the message we were trying to send.

But of course, with this Admin, the result they get is usually the opposite of what they planned. That's even granting that they even have a plan.

What a f'd up mess. We need to get the UN in and the US out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. thanks..don't know what happened with the original
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Headline is not accurate
I know I know, the rules require that it be verbatim.

They were looking in a building which was suspected of having chemical explosives....like C-4, etc. Not banned chemical toxins.

Typical pravda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. So that is PROOF that they HAD weapons of mass destruction
because if they didn't have WMD they wouldn't have bombed but because they bombed they must HAVE HAD WMD....... by the way did I show you my crack vile that represents what anthrax WOULD look like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh Christ, gonna need some more ISG guys I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC