Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. General Recommends Highest Rebuke for Prison Supervisors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:45 AM
Original message
U.S. General Recommends Highest Rebuke for Prison Supervisors
Edited on Mon May-03-04 07:47 AM by maddezmom
U.S. General Recommends Highest Rebuke for Prison Supervisors
Former Iraqi Intel Officer Chosen to Lead Fallujah Brigade
By Sewell Chan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, May 3, 2004; 8:24 AM


BAGHDAD, May 3 -- U.S. officials disclosed Monday that the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, has recommended issuing the highest form of administrative rebuke against six officers or sergeants who helped supervise the troubled Abu Ghraib detention facility west of Baghdad, which is the focus of an investigation of alleged abuse of Iraqi prisoners.

Six unnamed supervisors will each receive a general-officer memorandum of reprimand, a document that can effectively end an officer's career by making future promotion impossible. A seventh supervisor will receive a letter of admonishment, a lesser form of penalty.

The official would not identify the units or ranks of the seven supervisors who will be punished.

They are separate from the six enlisted soldiers who were criminally charged in March in the physical and sexual abuse of about 20 prisoners at Abu Ghraib in October and November last year. Four other enlisted soldiers are still under criminal investigation.
~snip~
more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61989-2004May3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. sweeping it under the rug and out of the media
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yeah. That's it.
I saw the same sort of thing happen in Vietnam, when the officers who ordered a POW shot got reprimands at most, while the enlisted men who carried out the orders got long miliitary prison terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Well these enlisted fucks have got to wake up!!!
The enlisted men and women have got to know that when they follow illegal orders or behave in the "encouraged way", it is they who will bear the brunt of military punishment and public scorn - not their officers!! These guys are so stupid it makes me sick! This is the best we can do? The draft should be reinstated. I say this with two draft-age kids of my own. The reason it must be reinstated is so that there isn't the dependency on the "career". There would be some from of acknowledgement that there is a life beyond the military. I don't want a "professional" army. I want one with everyday men and women who love their country and think about the people - not their advancement. If that makes our army less effective, less able to range all over the world causing death and destruction - then good. I am far more afraid of our own "professional" army than I am of any foreign threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Reprimand???
WTF!!!!

Why aren't their butts at a court-martial? Why no criminal charges? War crimes???

THis is atrocious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Highest form of rebuke"?
So, its gonna be "SHAME on you. Now, go collect your pension and join the private sector".

Presumably the "contractors" won't even get a "bad boy" harangue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dand Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. The enlisted soldiers will be punished,
The brass will get a pass, different spanks for different ranks, every officer in that prison should be court martial ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. They should be charged with murder
How many Americans are going to be tortured and killed as retaliation for the abuse that the Iraqi's have been subjected to?

I am just sickened by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. When is Herr Rumsfeldt going to refer cases
...of CIA and contractor offenders to DOJ for prosecution?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. NEVER HE WILL NEVER DO A THING n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. How about a 'war crimes trial?'
If this were any other country we would be screaming about court martials, war crimes, terrorism, barberism, fascism, and 'these people'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. now it's easy to understand why bu$h didn't want us in the ICC
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sspiderjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. Biden advised our response must be STRONG and swift, or else
Edited on Mon May-03-04 08:54 AM by sspiderjohn
we are in trouble. I can't recall his exact words, but essentially, Biden (on Fox News yesterday) said this is the worst debacle we've had in our Middle East relations in a decade, and if the Arab world does not see an immediate STRONG response on our part, the abuse incident will greatly intensify hate for Americans throughout the Arab world.

IMHO, this slap on the wrist ain't gonna cut it -- our ho-hum bureaucratic response is going to eventually cost a lot of American lives in the Middle East, perhaps elsewhere, as the hatred intensifies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. Here's an idea...
How about dishonorable discharge effective immediately?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Requires a formal hearing
...the way to get it immediately is to refer the case for court martial. Officers get dismisssed at courts-martial. The administrative equivalent is an Other than Honorable that may be elected by someone charged with a BCD or higher offense, subject to the approval of the courts-martial convening authority.

When is rumdum gonna refer civilian offenders to DOJ for prosecution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Great! </sarcasm> With a Halliburton application attached
to the letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. I am sure Winston sent bad boy letters Adolf
So now Don't worry about them little blotches on your resume folks, just tell them you were in the Texas Air National Guard. Your future employer is sure to understand.

The names below are mentioned on the listed pages with the name
OPERATION PAPERCLIP
http://www.namebase.org/cgi-bin/nb06?_OPERATION_PAPERCLIP_

It's time for another Bush/Nazis thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=199853
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. They aren't even getting fired?
They get a 'demerit'?

Man....even my cynical self thought they'd get more punishment than that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Loss of Rank (All Of It) And Time in the Brig Would Seem Appropriate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. Rebuke, admonishment -- oh yeah, they're really hitting hard!
After all, a slap on the wrist would be considered corporal punishment -- why that would be tantamount to torture!

When are these slime going to realize the covering up and dodging will do even more harm to the reputation of the U.S. and its military than did the original crimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. they are more worried about their own reputations, pensions etc.
than "harming the reputation of the US military".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. "administrative rebuke"
nope, won't do. Nothing short of criminal will do. We need to demand an independant investigation.

http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engmde140172004
"Amnesty International is calling for investigations into alleged abuses by Coalition Forces to be conducted by a body that is competent, impartial and independent, and seen to be so, and that any findings of such investigations be made public."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhonk Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. No need for a rebuke
Why bother with a rebuke? Honest mistake - they weren't sufficiently trained in running prisons, just like the enlisted / contractor perpetrators weren't trained in the Geneva Convention.

All they need is a bit of training in how prison life ought to work. 20 or 30 years living in a prison, as an inmate, ought to help them get some perspective. maybe 50, to be on the safe side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. Imagine if this (torture, humiliation) was done to American POW's
And the offending army was going to hand out some administrative reprimands as punishment. How would that play in middle America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC