Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader campaign run out of charity office: Violating election rules?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 08:36 AM
Original message
Nader campaign run out of charity office: Violating election rules?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37363-2004Jun12.html

Since October, Ralph Nader has run his campaign for president out of the same downtown Washington offices that through April housed a public charity he created -- an overlap that campaign finance specialists said could run afoul of federal laws.

Tax law explicitly forbids public charities from aiding political campaigns. Violations can result in a charity losing its tax-exempt status. In addition, campaign law requires candidates to account for all contributions -- including shared office space and resources, down to the use of copying machines, receptionists and telephones.

Records show many links between Nader's campaign and the charity Citizen Works. For example, the charity's listed president, Theresa Amato, is also Nader's campaign manager. The campaign said in an e-mail to The Washington Post that Amato resigned from the charity in 2003. But in the charity's most recent corporate filing with the District, in January, Amato listed herself as the charity's president and registered agent.

The office suite housing the campaign, the charity and other sub-tenants had a common receptionist for greeting visitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nader's exhibiting some sneakiness
Maybe the republicans aren't just helping him financially, maybe they're also giving him tips on how to dodge the media:

Nader could not answer specific questions about the arrangement. He referred inquiries to Amato, the manager of both his 2000 and 2004 presidential bids. While Nader was available for at least a half-dozen interviews last week, repeated calls to Amato were not returned. Zeese said that she was too busy to talk to a reporter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hmm, I wonder if Wash. Times & other RW media are also covering
this story?? (I bet not!)

Just curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, but Drudge linked it
He throws a few bones to our side to pretend like he's impartial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can he get kicked out of the elction for this?
I'd laugh if he did. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hard to tell from the article what the penalty to the campaign would be
Edited on Sun Jun-13-04 12:27 PM by AlGore2004dotORG
I suspect it would be a fine at most. Maybe there's an FEC lawyer in DUdom who could answer that. The article focuses on the punishment to the charity - - that it could lose its not for profit status, which would mean paying back taxes and a fine. But Nader has so many charities that he will probably not be affected at all by one losing its tax exempt status.

I will be shocked if any investigation is completed before the election is over - - or if one is, it gives Nader a clean bill of health, regardless of whether the law was broken.

To me, the larger story is that the Smirk FEC and the Smirk IRS should have investigated this earlier, based on this (apparently) illegal activity in the 2000 campaign.

From page 2:

FEC reports show that Nader's 2000 campaign organization also used Citizen Works facilities, paying the charity about $69,000 in 2001, 2002 and 2003 . Also in December 2003, the campaign donated about $5,800 to Citizen Works.

Form page 4:
Citizen Works's annual report lists its activities as holding news conferences, helping grass-roots groups, producing a newsletter and developing an e-mail list. It raised $181,000 in 2001, but ran a $15,000 deficit. The next year that deficit was recouped when the charity received a $21,000 "subtenant" payment from the Nader 2000 presidential campaign and about $580,000 in contributions, according to the tax return.

Coveted Location

The connections between Nader's political activities and the charity go back to the creation of Citizen Works. As late as 2003, Nader's 2000 campaign organization rented space from Citizen Works as the campaign closed out its books. On March 1, 2002, Amato received $3,225 from the campaign for her services as a consultant, FEC reports state. On the same day, the campaign wrote a rent check to Citizen Works for $4,000. At the time, Amato was the campaign's treasurer and Citizen Works's executive director and president, records show.


Granted, I am assuming that the FEC and IRS have not investigated the 2000 issues only because the WashPost does not mention any earlier investigation of the relationship between Nader 2000 and Citizen Works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC