Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prosecutor Jailed for Leaving Phone Off

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:41 PM
Original message
Prosecutor Jailed for Leaving Phone Off
Edited on Sat Jun-19-04 07:44 PM by Crisco
LA GRANDE, Ore. (AP) -- A prosecutor was briefly sent to jail along with the man he helped convict of manslaughter after the lawyer refused a judge's order to turn on his cell phone.

Judge Phillip Mendiguren tried to reach Birnbaum with a jury question while the lawyer was on his lunch break Friday, Undersheriff Dana Wright said. When Birnbaum returned to court, Mendiguren ordered him to keep his cell phone on. The prosecutor refused, and the judge cited him for contempt.


1. Did the prosecutor have a responsibility to be available at all times?

2. Will it now be illegal for people in certain professions to be incommunicado when they are off the clock?

edit: OOPSIE

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-BRF-Cell-Phone-Prosecutor.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uptown ruler Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. lame...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimoreboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you have a link
There has to be more to this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Judge's prerogative
Edited on Sat Jun-19-04 07:45 PM by BareKnuckledLiberal
Judges are given enormous discretion. Most of them use it well, and some are just out-of-control bullies. Chances are good, though, that the prosecutor was arrogant in his refusal.

Being a lawyer in a felony case, especially where a death has occurred, is a serious responsibility. Staying available by cell phone is not too much to ask of proescutors -- or defenders.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimoreboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You are being ridiculous
Everyone gets off time. Unless the judge had given prior warning that he might need to contact the lawyer, he has no right to oblige 24-7 access to an attorney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What Did They Do In the Old Days?
Not being on intimate terms with pre-cell phone era lawyers, one wonders what lunch-time protocol was way back when.

TV, movies give us the image of sending a clerk out for lunch while they wait in the office, by the phone. But then, that's Hollywood, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorFlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The story states that the lawyer had been ordered by the judge to
keep the phone on. It's not an unreasonable request during a proceeding which may be stalled by an inability to reach someone with decision making authority. This was not punishment for failing to be available in the past, it was punishment for refusing to keep the phone on for the duration of the case. Perfectly fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Actually, the Judge was within his rights
Edited on Sat Jun-19-04 08:21 PM by kanrok
a jury is out deliberating. They may have a question. The Judge is required under the law to advise both parties of the nature of the question, and to solicit opinions from each side about how to answer the question, or if the question should even be answered. Not wanting to wait for a lawyer to finish lunch in the middle of jury deliberations is eminently reasonable. The prosecutor is a putz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Sorry, this is exactly how it happens
Being on call is a fact of life in many professions -- especially in medicine, but it happens in law, too. Computer systems administrators are also often subject to being on call.

I was in medicine for about ten years, working as a tech, not a physician, but I was on call on many occasions. It didn't cut into my down-time very much, but I had to be available to do a test on an hour's notice (I did EEGs).

The lawyer on call will get plenty of time to relax, believe me. But during a trial, it's not unheard of for a lead attorney to be on call 24/7, even if the call never comes.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like a couple of power drunks with no concern for a fair trial.
Both the DA and the Judge were likely elected and there could have been some political bad blood between them. Whatever, neither of them should have gotten into a battle of wills in the midst of a murder trial. Such a disruption could easily provide grounds for an appeal. The question of availability in the era of cell phones is important, and this incident should prompt the county and/or state bar associations to consider the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't state employees have mandated breaks?
The question couldn't wait an hour?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Actually - I would surprised if they did
and there are times when they have to stay around until midnight or whenever - if the jury is out.

I think it has been typical that they be reachable, fairly easily, during trials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC