Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Retrial opens on using pepper spray on protesters' eyes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:16 AM
Original message
Retrial opens on using pepper spray on protesters' eyes
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2004/09/10/BAG8O8MK8Q1.DTL

An attorney for anti-logging protesters whose eyes were swabbed with liquid pepper spray during sit-ins seven years ago opened a retrial of their damage suit Thursday by accusing Humboldt County officers of devising a strategy to punish the demonstrators, and intimidate others, by inflicting pain that amounted to torture.

The officers' attorney countered that the caustic chemical was a safe and necessary response to "organized lawlessness.''

An eight-member U.S. District Court jury in San Francisco heard opening statements in the second trial of a suit stemming from the unprecedented use of liquid pepper spray to break up demonstrations at Pacific Lumber Co. and a congressman's office in 1997. Another jury deadlocked 4-4 in the first trial in 1998.

The protesters chained themselves together at company headquarters in Scotia and at the Eureka office of a pro-logging congressman, Frank Riggs, in 1997. Two demonstrators also fastened themselves to logging equipment on Pacific Lumber property.

After warnings, sheriff's deputies and Eureka police pulled the protesters' heads back and applied Q-tips doused in pepper spray to the corners of their eyes. Those who refused to move were sprayed in the face at close range.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope the protesters win.
That was a disgusting display of sadism.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Geez.... how civlized we have become-- sickening, absolutely sickening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. If they were able to get close enough and the
protesters were docile enough to have swabs used on their eyes, then it is torture. There is no other definition.

I hope those bastards get fined, fired, and thrown into prison for that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Check out the video.
It's really disgusting. Those cops should be behind bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sick sick people.
Scotia still has the Support Our Troops signs placed in strategic bushes around the town. It's absolutely disgusting. Caveman mentality. I don't mean to start a conversation about the phrase. I mean, I translate that to Support Our War. Maybe it's just me, but I'm offended beyond my limits, every time I go there. I suppose I'm also a tad bit annoyed that they could bulldoze beautiful forests, for profit.
Good luck people. It took 11 years for Cherney to win his case against being bombed by the FBI.
Argh. I need a cup of coffee. I'm a ranting loonatic. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. "Support our Troops" really means "Support the President's Poor Policies"
And by extension of that logic, if you don't support the Pres' poor policies, then you don't support the troops.

We live in an age where words have lost their meaning. If we really "supported" the troops, we'd bring them home right away, as there is no national interest being served by their presence overseas in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Link to video of this assault
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 11:49 AM by WatchWhatISay
From Democracy Now

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/08/1422252&mode=thread&tid=25

If you aren't watching/listening to Democracy Now, you are really missing out.

Video of Humboldt County police officers using pepper spray-soaked cotton swabs on activists at a protest at Pacific Lumber's offices, in Scotia, California on September 25, 1997.
- Excerpt from the documentary "Fire in the Eyes," Courtesy Headwaters Action Video Collective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Now there's a legal term for you
"pain compliance"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who needs a justice system
When the cops just administer the "sentence" for a crime on the spot.

There is no way that anyone, anywhere could justify this type of treatment by law enforcement.

If some Fuck who calls himself a cop did that to my daughter I would KILL him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC