Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New UN resolution on Iraq jeopardized by fierce resistance: US officials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 11:12 AM
Original message
New UN resolution on Iraq jeopardized by fierce resistance: US officials
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20030826/pl_afp/iraq_us_un&cid=1521&ncid=1480

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The United States is rethinking plans to press ahead with a new UN resolution that would expand the mandate of the stabilization force in Iraq after meeting fierce resistance from opponents of the war, US officials said.

Although the officials stressed the idea was not dead they said the initial reaction to US suggestions presented last week had not been positive and that their hopes for passing a new resolution in early September had dimmed.

"The initial reaction wasn't very promising," one State Department official said of the response to suggestions for the resolution put forward by John Negroponte, the US ambassador to the United Nations.

The negative reactions -- mainly from anti-war Security Council members France, Russia and Germany -- revolve around US insistence that it not cede any control over the command of the stabilization force, officials said.

In addition, those nations and some other council members are resisting any language in the resolution that would suggest UN authorization of the war after the fact, the officials said.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
Bush made this mess, Bush should suck it up and do whatever it takes to fulfil America's responsibilities as an occupying power. Even if that means raising taxes on the rich and reinstating the military draft.

Will that harm his chances for election in 2004? Probably, but so what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't forget to rate this a 5 at Yahoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You should see Yahoo's highest-rated stories.
Almost all bad news for President Junior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindashaw Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Amazing, isn't it? And the top-selling ten books at Amazon.com
are about what has happened since the Bushies took over. Can't wait to read "Bushwhacked" by Molly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. But look at most viewed
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=index&cid=1776

#1 America Sets New Roller Coaster Record

This page fully explains why we've got the mess we've got in this country. The bulk of the articles are fluff. Ireland obesity, Michael Jackson, Everybody Loves Raymond. Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. so the deal is
after months of calling the French and Germans every
name in the book, boycotting products and travel,
the US wants more bodies to guard the oil pipelines to
remove the troops now doing it and more bodies who are
not Americans or British to relieve the pressure from
Americans here to bring the troops home but the Bushies
don't want to give these countries anything on the ground
in exchange for their efforts.

Sounds unfair and unbalanced as usual...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Someone should explain to these morons that
you cannot threaten someone with something they are
not afraid of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. So when will Cheney order air strikes against these rejectionists?

That should take care of any "resistance."

Those nations have been ordered to present their troops for duty.

They must decide if they would rather lose those troops or whoever happens to be hanging around the Eiffel Tower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipper58 Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Never, in the case of France or Russia
because they both have nukes, and as we all know, Bushco only attacks countries that can't fight back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Looks like Old Europe may not be with us on this . . .
Which means they're against us, according to the Irrefutable Logic of Unfocused Rage. I suppose Rumsfeld and the other Death Merchants in the Defense Department (how soon before it's renamed the "Department of Peace" in some Orwellian twist of language) are already formulating plans to offer the French and the Germans a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. If someone comes to you
And says we want some of your military men and women to come patrol Baghdad and provide security. They might get killed, though we hope not. However, you will have no authority or even any say-so whatever concerning how they will be led and what they will do.

What would you do? Hand your guys over? I don't think so.

No wonder these countries are balking. The U.S. wants help but they will give absolutely nothing for it.

If the US were in these countries' shoes and were made such an offer, they'd never even take it seriously. So why should these countries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why should...
these soldiers die for Enron, Betchel, Haliburton, and Bushistas
Re-Selection?????? We mocked these countries and know we want them to help us for nothing in return!!! NO!!! They should resist this B.S!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC