Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Rules Against Patriot Act Provision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 11:35 AM
Original message
Judge Rules Against Patriot Act Provision
Part of the Patriot Act, a central plank of the Bush Administration's war on terror, was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge on Wednesday.


U.S. District Judge Victor Marreo ruled in favor of the American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites), which challenged the power the FBI (news - web sites) has to demand confidential financial records from companies as part of terrorism investigations.
The ruling was the latest blow to the Bush administration's anti-terrorism policies.


In June, the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) ruled that terror suspects being held in places like Guantanamo Bay can use the American judicial system to challenge their confinement. That ruling was a defeat for the president's assertion of sweeping powers to hold "enemy combatants" indefinitely after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.


The ACLU sued the Department of Justice (news - web sites), arguing that part of the Patriot legislation violated the constitution because it authorizes the FBI to force disclosure of sensitive information without adequate safeguards.


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=3&u=/nm/20040929/ts_nm/rights_patriot_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obviously another activist judge creating law from the bench <sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. KICK
KICK

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rate it up n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hooray for Russ Feingold!
The lone holdout to vote AGAINST the patriot act...has now been vindicated!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I will be happier when
the parts of the Patriot Act ruled unconstitutional have to do with individual rights, not privacy rights of a corporation.

"...power the FBI has to demand confidential financial records from companies ...



:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I interpret the ruling a little differently than you do..
The financial information was being required FROM companies, but ABOUT individual person's! I don't think the patriot act has a lot of effect on corporate rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. A blow to Bu$h fascism. Hope this holds up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. We better keep an eye on this judge
I'd hate to see him get locked up for being a terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. FBI eyes check it out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. John Asscrop is not having a good day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. YAAAAAAY!
Fuck you Ashcroft!








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. Needs a ittle
:kick:

Don't forget to rate the story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. NY Times Story
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/30/national/30patriot.html

The ruling came in a case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union against a kind of subpoena created under the act, known as a national security letter. Such letters could be used in terrorism investigations to require Internet service companies to provide personal information about subscribers and would bar them from disclosing to anyone that they had received a subpoena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is not a good day for the Reich..
but a swell one for the rest of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC