Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Seeks Delay in Nuclear Timeline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 02:59 AM
Original message
U.S. Seeks Delay in Nuclear Timeline
U.S. Seeks Delay in Nuclear Timeline
Wed Sep 3, 6:44 PM ET
By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer

WASHINGTON - The United States said Wednesday it will not meet an April 2004 deadline for destroying 45 percent of its chemical weapons stockpile. The Pentagon (news - web sites) said it has asked the world body that governs the destruction requirement for a delay until December 2007.



The United States has destroyed about 23 percent of its declared stockpile of 31,280 tons of mustard gas, sarin and other chemical weapons. Environmental, safety and other problems at high-temperature incinerators have made it impossible to meet the 2004 deadline, the Pentagon said.


In line with provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1997, the United States submitted its request for more time to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.


The Chemical Weapons Convention was the first treaty in history requiring elimination of an entire class of weapons under a timetable and under oversight of international inspectors. The vast majority of nations — 153 — are treaty members, but significant gaps exist, especially in the Middle East, where Israel, Egypt and other Arab states have failed to ratify it. (snip/...)

~~~~ link ~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. In fact, it's all about chemical, not nuclear
I know it's not your headline, but the entire article is about chemical weapons, and makes no mention of nuclear weapons at all. What kind of editing do they do on that site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spentastic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Shit!
The U.S has WMD and a demonstrably mentally unstable leader. Quick someone invade!

Oh. I forgot we only do that to brown people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devils Advocate NZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Gotta love it!
The amount of weapons being talked about are similar to the amounts Bush said that Iraq had. Now, get this, they are saying it will take a decade (or more) to destroy these weapons even though they are the richest most powerful nation on Earth, yet they went apeshit that Iraq didn't disarm in around the same amount of time?

And then guess what? It turns out, that unless the original figures were total bullshit, they DID! Iraq was better at disarming than the US!

Gotta love the irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. But yet Saddam destroyed all of his just days before the US invaded...
...according to our fearless leaders. Thats why they can't find them they say.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC