Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reaction To Falluja From the Pentagon - 500 Iraqi soldiers didn't show up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:19 AM
Original message
Reaction To Falluja From the Pentagon - 500 Iraqi soldiers didn't show up
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0411/09/lad.01.html

<snip>KOCH: Now, Rumsfeld says that he does not know if militant leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi is in Falluja. Of course, Zarqawi a man with a $25 million price on his head, who has claimed responsibility for so much of the violence thus far in Iraq. Military leaders saying basically if they catch Zarqawi in Falluja, it will simply be a bonus, because the expectation is that he and his lieutenants have had ample time to slip quietly out of this city.

Now, speaking to the slipping quietly away, there are a number, perhaps hundreds, of Iraqi soldiers who did not turn up for this very decisive battle. The defense secretary yesterday saying basically that this is an isolated problem, though something that should be expected from time to time, considering the circumstances. But still this is not welcome news for the Pentagon, Carol, because this is the force that is supposed to take over security in Iraq so that U.S. troops can eventually come home -- back to you.

COSTELLO: When you say, Kathleen, that many Iraqi soldiers didn't show up, what are we talking about? Is there a specific number that we know of?

KOCH: Well, those numbers are very fuzzy. Apparently there are reports that perhaps as many as 500 didn't show up for the battle, but then there is some talk that there may have simply been some confusion behind-the-scenes, that they were on leave, didn't realize they needed to come back.

But again, these are the kinds of things that need to be worked out so that these troops can be reliably counted upon under any sort of circumstance, and especially for a critical battle like this.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. watched that interview in the am
wonder how many had the battle plan....simply confused?? maybe, maybe not. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They do know an Iraqi General disappeared with the battle plans
I would probably use the word 'defected'. Or maybe 'came in from the cold' would be more appropriate, since he may have planned it for some time. This was in LBN yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. yea, Nik Robertson reported it on Sat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Holy moly!
I had missed that, wtf?!?!?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read yesterday that there were only 425 Iraqis participating
Which would mean about half of them didn't show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. you guys got it aLL wrong
the iraqis are in aLabama working on a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. LOL! Taking their cue from "Bush the Moraler"
Perhaps some day they too wish to be leader of a country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. OMIGOD! Now they don't even know if the main insurgent is in
Fallujah! Are you kidding me? This is just not happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. look for the illusion
always. Is this a way of stepping back from the bigger grander plans of an even bigger assault than has already happened? Maybe recognition that the plan had a HUGE risk attached to it - and a recognition that the risk was real (esp in light of the huge Iraqi guard defection)... but since they put so much PR into their buildup to the assualt they have to "save face" in walking away from the plans?

Or is this just my wishful thinking, speaking out loud?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You are assuming a degree of rationality...
...that the US command has not demonstrated to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. indeed
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Zarqairi is being downplayed by the WH (and therefore the media)
same logic as downplaying OBL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. That means someone new will pop up soon as the new "mastermind"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I heard days before the invasion
on CNN yet... that they figured that he'd left the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. He's having high tea and watching cricket in Pakistan
with Musharrif and bin Laden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Reminds me of a guy named Marvin ...
Marvin the ARVN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randi_Listener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. FREEDOM IS ON THE MARCH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. why are the numbers fuzzy?
this battle has been planned for months, they have to have very precise numbers of troops expected.

Simple counting will tell you how many showed up.

Simple subtraction will tell you how many bailed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. There are no fuzzy numbers. Soldiers line up every morning to be counted..
If they give us a the actual number, which is probably a lot more than 500, then people would get pissed, people would get fired for not doing their jobs, people would know that the "enemy" has our battle plan, but most of all, the people, American people would know we are fucking up over there on a royal basis. And they can't let that happen because FREEDOM IS ON THE MARCH...so exhausting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. You know behind-the-scenes, maybe on leave and didn't realize
Who trained these so-called 'troops', Chickenhawks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Now, I ask all of you......
would you show up for the chance at getting blown to bits? Do you think these Iraqis are going to stupidly follow the American generals? They may be smarter than we are:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. this operation is wrong on so many levels
One overlooked aspect is the flip-flopper in chief, they way he has manipulated this politically. (I know you're all shocked.) But consider a little history here.

We were originally welcomed in Fallujah, and then they asked us to leave. We didn't. They protested. We killed protesters. Then they killed 4 contractors who they said were sons of bitches and we said were boy scouts. THEN, in contravention to international law, we went into Fallujah in an operation widely seen as retaliation against a population being occupied by a foreign army (pretty sure this is a war crime, and it was ordered by the CIC.) We get a bunch of our guys killed and piss off the entire Muslim world. The Marine commander there then negotiates a ceasefire over the objections of the neocons. Apparently he has now been replaced by a commander that thinks we're going after Satan, and the latest operation is put on hold until AFTER OUR ELECTIONS! Outrageous how they play politics with our troop's lives at stake. But no one complains about the delay, only now supposedly Zarqawi/saddam/osama whatever-the-name of their major excuse is gone.

What a disaster! What incompetence! And just as the Iraqi resistance did not cooperate in getting killed by Shock and Awe, just as they didn't get the memo on the war being over, they don't even have the decency to get killed in Fallujah. They're killing our boys in Baghdad, because they've had months to plan and they aren't stupid.

The CIC and his merry band of chickenhawks are a disaster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. Iraqi security forces? What a joke!
We're never getting out of Iraq!!!!!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. You are so right.
When you have 14 military bases, 14!!!, there is no way in hell we are leaving any time soon, if ever. If we ever did, it would be the next Iran. Pissed off at us, vowing to kill Americans, etc. Hmmm, sounds like it's already like that now. We should leave then, we have nothing to loose. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ilovenicepeople Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Has anyone seen a single picture of these 14 bases?
I'm not saying that they don't exsist,I just have'nt seen or heard anything about them(it would explain where all the missing billions went)I'm also curious about this "Family Values"thing,"How much is a dead Iraqi family worth?":shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. I just love how we keep training the terrorists. We are own worst enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. Zarqawi the composite chameleon terrorist
Of course they'll downplay him. They built him up before the election, thinking they would get him as a boost to bush's chances of winning.

Not necessary now. The boogeyman can slink back into the shadows and be conveniently blamed for everything from now on.

14 military bases in Iraq, folks, 14 military bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Zarqawi has replaced the terror alerts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
29. Math is reality based while fuzzy math is Bush based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. This article states only 170 showed up.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2109360/

snip>

Bush probably intends the offensive to serve as a final showdown for the insurgents, but, regardless of the immediate outcome (and I write this with no pleasure whatever), it might be a final showdown for us instead. There are two factors at work here.

First, the offensive is billed as a joint operation by the U.S. military and the Iraqi national guard, but it hasn't worked out that way. National Public Radio's Anne Garrels, who is embedded with the Marines in Fallujah, reports that of the 500 Iraqi soldiers originally deployed to go in alongside U.S. forces only 170 were still on station when the operation began. The rest had deserted—whether simply to flee for their safety or to join the other side. And these Iraqis were members of the 36th Special Operations battalion, the elite of the country's new security forces. In short, quite apart from what happens in Fallujah, the Iraqis are not remotely ready to provide defense by themselves.

Second, coupled with this grim realization, the U.S. military is finding itself increasingly alone and isolated in this war. A small story in the Nov. 4 New York Times listed the various countries that are pulling out of this "coalition." Hungary had just announced, the day before, that it would withdraw its 300 troops from Iraq. This move would come on top of withdrawals, either actual or announced, by Spain (1,300 troops); Poland (2,400); the Netherlands (1,400); Thailand (450); the Dominican Republic (302); Nicaragua (115); Honduras (370); the Philippines (51); Norway (155); and New Zealand (60). Other countries will soon reduce their troop levels— Singapore, from 191 to 32; Moldova, from 42 to 12; and Bulgaria, from 483 to 430. For the most part, these aren't large numbers—the United States has always contributed the vast bulk of the forces, with Britain, Australia, and Italy trailing far behind—but that's not the point. Their joining the coalition was presented as a show of international support; their departing will be widely perceived as an erosion of that support.

So what to do? Bush may well see the Fallujah offensive as a last gamble to turn things around. My guess is that, if it goes "well," by any stretch of a definition—and if the elections proceed with the slightest semblance of order—he might make preparations to declare victory and pull out. Such a move would almost certainly trigger chaos, but could this chaos be much more rampant than the state of life there now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC