Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Twenty-Two U.S. Troops Killed in Falluja -U.S. General

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:23 PM
Original message
Twenty-Two U.S. Troops Killed in Falluja -U.S. General
NEAR FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) - Twenty-two American troops have been killed and 170 wounded in the four-day assault on Falluja that has seen U.S. forces take about 80 percent of the rebel city so far, a U.S. Marine general said on Friday.

Lieutenant General Thomas Sattler, commander of the offensive, said five Iraqis had also been killed in the operation launched in a blaze of artillery fire on Monday. But U.S. forces were still conducting house-to-house searches for insurgents.

"We occupy about 80 percent of the city right now," Sattler told reporters at a U.S. base on the edge of Falluja. "There is much clearing to be done even though we occupy about 80 percent."
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=564&e=5&u=/nm/20041112/ts_nm/iraq_usa_casualties_dc

Good thing this happened after the election, otherwise people might have thought twice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
byronm Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. 22 too many
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Occupied 80% of the city"--does that have ANY strategic value?
Or are we just being fed "we are winning, yea team" facts to make us feel like we are getting something for the blood of our fellow Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbassman03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. In the YAY TEAM way...
I thought they said earlier that it would be very easy until the end, when all the insurgents were in the center of the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. no value what so ever...
they are playing whack-a-mole for dummies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good analogy, whack a mole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. "IT'S WHACK A MOLE FOR JESUS", Gen Richard Myers
That's right before you Napalm, the rag heads and make cooked blackened bacon out of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. ahh yes... and 'Satan is in Fallujah".....
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 07:05 PM by leftchick
:puke: fucking fundie freaks....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. wow, that's 10% more than yesterday!
Orwellian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ctrl_Alt_Del Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. "We're makin' good progress"
Freedumb is on the march. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Hi Ctrl_Alt_Del!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. No, the object of guerilla warfare
is not to take and hold territory, but to strike at targets of opportunity.

They do need some base of operations, and they had one in Fallujah, so this is taking that away from them. But guerillas tend to be pretty mobil and there are many other areas that will serve, and are serving as bases. We simply don't have the number of troops necessary to hold them all.

It probably won't be possible no matter how many troops we have in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. 'Gorilla' warfare, run by alien lizards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. The civilian branch of the Pentagon suckered themselves into this.
Because you know the military guys have studied the war in Vietnam. And just consider that, presumably, the Iraqi insurgents don't have the military infrastructure that the North Vietnamese had and the South Vietnamese sympathizers had. Just imagine if there's an Iraqi version of Giap gaming the strategies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. That's what I thought. "80% of Falluja" means nothing:
it isn't all THAT hard to move a base for guerillas, terrorists, insurgents, what have you.

We can't physically occupy enough cities.

And the Iraqis aren't helping.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are widely varying estimates on how many insurgents stayed
to fight and how many slipped out of Fallujah before the battle even began, but most admit at the very least all the leaders got away.
Kinda makes this just another bunch of folks on both sides dead or wounded in vain...and one more city to rebuild on our dime.
Real shrewd, bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. To 22 families "We just liberated Fallujah!"
Who will give their only son to now liberate Mosul?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. The numbers lie
Don't forget that our government doesn't count as Killed In Action the soldiers whose wounds are so grave, they die en route to Germany or in the hospital in Germany.

I'll wager those numbers are, in reality, much, much higher.

Gee. Our government playing fast and loose with facts. I am shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. here's what I notice
22 US soldiers killed, from the best trained and equipped military in history. 5 Iraqis killed, from a military that didn't exist a couple of months ago. The Pentagon likes to pretend that this is a shared operation between the two forces, half of the force attacking Fallujah are Iraqis. So why are the caualties so different? are Iraqis not on the front lines? are they not fighting? interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. If they didn't think twice
after chimpy had already killed more than 1100 troops in a war that he clearly lied us into, this wouldn't have done it either. More likely just made people rally around their "wartime president" even more.

Still, it's clear that he was just waiting for the election to be finished to begin the bloodbath in Fallujah.

Maybe people will begin to think twice once the draft gets started. Then they will start to have a real stake in it. Until then, it's just a video game for most people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Riiiiight...
18 on the first day, and only 4 in the last 3 days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. and how many Iraqis did they kill?
How many are starving to death, or dying from thirst, or dying from lack of medical attention -- how long will the Iraqi doctors and nurses be prevented from working in Iraqi hospitals?

Seems like the goal is to make the city unlivable.

Now we know what happens when serial killers are put in the white house by psychotic GOPigs.

Will the troops ever regain their humanity? And how many will turn to hunting and killing of US citizens -- after crossing over to the dark side and getting a taste of the forbidden fruit? (Tim McVeigh and the DC sniper come quickly to mind.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. I just heard on the news - 6 of them were from Illinois.
That's over 25% from our state alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. We've had two from Michigan......
that we know of. I don't trust them to tell the truth.

F*** you Bush/Blair!!!!!

Our flags will be flying at half staff once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCon1 Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. Does anybody know
how many of our Iraqi "allies" have been killed thus far in the war? I have found these stats to be elusive. It seems important too. How can we accurately assess the success of our campaign if we don't know the actual number of casualties? Bush made such a case about the contributions made by the Iraqis in debate number one but we never hear any hard numbers on their casualties for some reason. To me, it seems like selective perception. We percieve that everything is going well because we don't percieve the actual number of casualties inflicted upon us by the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. It is selective: the strategy is to keep our casualties down,
and Iraqi civilians, police and recruits are taking huge hits.

The attacks and car bombs are largely targeting Iraqis, as soft targets and as the lynchpin of Bush's strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC