Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Real Target? (Was London not US target 2004 elections?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:50 PM
Original message
The Real Target? (Was London not US target 2004 elections?)
Edited on Wed Nov-17-04 06:54 PM by RamboLiberal
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6514619/site/newsweek/

The latest analysis of evidence that led to last summer’s Code Orange alert suggests that Al Qaeda operatives were plotting a “big bomb” attack against a major landmark in Britain—but had no active plans for strikes in the United States, U.S. intelligence sources tell NEWSWEEK.

The reassessment of Al Qaeda plans is the latest indication that much of the Bush administration’s repeatedly voiced concerns about a pre-election attack inside the United States was based in part on an early misreading of crucial intelligence seized months ago in Pakistan.

The new view is that there was indeed an active Al Qaeda plot underway earlier this year—one that involved coded communications between high-level operatives in Pakistan and a British cell headed by a longtime associate of September 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.

The plot was aimed at setting off a large bomb at a prestigious economic or political target inside the United Kingdom—in effect to make a political statement against the British government. Among the targets considered in detail by the plotters, sources say, was London’s Heathrow Airport, the Houses of Parliament and Westminster Abbey.

<snip>

According to a U.S. government official, fears of terror attacks have prompted FBI agents based in the U.S. Embassy in London to avoid traveling on London's popular underground railway (or tube) system, which is used daily by millions of commuters.

Remember Ashcroft not traveling on airline planes from July 2001 on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think the only thing that is stopping London from getting bombed is that
the fascists can't figure out if it would hurt or help Blair considering the way he's played this whole thing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. They knew London was the target but reported US to scare the idiots
into voting for *. The Fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup
In fact, I remember reading on another site (of somewhat dubious authenticity) that Al Queda had ordered a 'stand down' of any US-based attacks until after the election. He wanted to make sure Bush was elected, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magic_Cookie Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. They would have been a laughing stock ....
"Shortly before the election, administration officials quietly acknowledged that at least one informant who last winter had provided lurid intelligence about a possible pre-election attack in the U.S. had apparently fabricated his allegations. Yet given the importance that waging the war on terror had assumed during the presidential campaign, administration officials apparently were reluctant to announce a lowering of the Orange-alert threat until after the election. "They would have been a laughing stock if they lowered it before the election," says Beers..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Why is it I'm not laughing...
It worked and we are stuck with * for 4 more years. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unionjack Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sounds like bollox to me....
.....i haven't seen a hint of this here.

And who says BinLaden wanted Bush to win ? That's not what the man himself said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Refresh my memory -- what bad news for Bush was happening
around that time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick... So the FBI doesn't use the Tube, eh?
Salon's picked up the story, and offers this:

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html

The report doesn't offer a whole lot more on the issue -- but toward the end there is one rather ominous paragraph about continuing worry of an attack in the British capitol.

"Some U.S. law-enforcement officers based in London, Newsweek has learned, have become extremely concerned about evidence regarding possible active Al Qaeda plots to attack targets in Britain. According to a U.S. government official, fears of terror attacks have prompted FBI agents based in the U.S. Embassy in London to avoid traveling on London's popular underground railway (or tube) system, which is used daily by millions of commuters. While embassy-based officers of the U.S. Secret Service, Immigration and Customs bureaus and the CIA still are believed to use the underground to go about their business, FBI agents have been known to turn up late to crosstown meetings because they insist on using taxis in London's traffic-choked business center."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. thanks for the kick...missed it the first time around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC