Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Conason (NY Observer): Skewed Priorities Make Us Less Safe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 11:24 AM
Original message
Joe Conason (NY Observer): Skewed Priorities Make Us Less Safe
Two years ago this week, our country suffered a momentous disaster that ought to have prompted a sharp change in the Bush administration’s foreign and domestic security policies.

On that awful day—after standing outside my home and watching the World Trade Center fall—I hoped that George W. Bush would reconsider his rejection of America’s multilateral traditions. That day, I wrote a column suggesting that if the President and his advisers grasped the dimensions of the threat posed by Islamist terror, they just might abandon their unilateral illusions. If they understood what real security required, they might even seek renewed cooperation with our alienated allies.

A faint facsimile of that recognition began to emerge last week, when Mr. Bush finally asked the United Nations to approve international assistance in Iraq. As our allies are all too well aware, he made that belated decision only under economic, military and political pressures that have become irresistible. The President has staked not only the prestige of the United States but the future safety of the nation on his gamble in Baghdad. On the anniversary of the terrorist atrocity, it seems appropriate to ask whether his policies since Sept. 11 have improved our safety, or left us in greater danger.

Critics of White House policy should acknowledge that Mr. Bush’s government has achieved significant victories against Al Qaeda, our primary enemy. Osama bin Laden’s territorial base of operations was destroyed and many of his lieutenants have been killed or captured. Despite frequent threats and constant intelligence "chatter" from the Islamist network, we have yet to suffer another attack on American soil.

more...

http://www2.observer.com/observer/pages/conason.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Under Clinton - two attacks on American Soil (bear with me)
First one, the First WTC attack.

Less than two months after BC took office. Clinton blamed for that. Mind you, the logic that W supporters use would lay the entire blame more distinctly on Poppy Bush than W could the 2nd WTC attack on Clinton.

Second attack, the Alfred P. Murrah (sp?) federal building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. By a guy who truly believed that Rush Limbaugh was wayyyy too liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC