Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Col. Hackworth: Time for Straight Talk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:57 AM
Original message
Col. Hackworth: Time for Straight Talk
Col. Hackworth will likely be supporting the Clark team all the way to the WH.

http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.cgi?database=Hacks%20Target%20Homepage.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=31&rnd=236.60431480416417

On the two-year anniversary of 9/11, both the hardliners within the administration and the chicken hawks on the airwaves are stubbornly continuing to blame the strikes on Saddam, painting his tyrannical regime as a major player in the Islamic fundamentalist jihad to maintain support for our gigantic misadventure in Iraq. It was the same sort of scare tactics the manipulators used during the Vietnam War when they kept asserting that a defeat there would be the key domino falling and we’d soon be defending the beaches of the West Coast from invading commies.

Once again, most Americans – including a lot of red-faced lawmakers – have fallen for the old Hitler trick: Tell a lie often enough and the people will believe it.

The losers are our soldiers still stuck in the sand, the scores of fallen warriors who were quietly buried from “sea to shining sea,” the hundreds of maimed who are maxing out our military hospitals, and the American taxpayers who’ll be laying out big bucks for a war against terrorism that has struck the wrong target.

more...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Hope You're Kidding
Hackworth hates Wesley Clark. Here's just one of his many columns blasting Clark:
http://www.hackworth.com/12jun01.html

-snip-
Recently retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark, who's now busy bad-mouthing the Pentagon for his screwing up the Serbian War, is one of the new corporate-general types. Clark, with a total of seven years with troops out of 33 years of service, spent the other 26 years punching his corporate ticket in "career essential assignments" such as getting a graduate degree, serving in the White House, being a general's aide and doing time on high staffs. All were critical punches for him if he wanted to wear stars in our modern Army.
-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "Critical punches" are part of the military career
like troop assignments and wearing the correct medals in the correct way in one's photo.

I've never been a fan of Clinton's and have written published letters highly critical of him. That doesn't mean I'm going to choose any yahoo like Bush over him.

Clark can't begin to negatively compare to Bush when it comes to the destruction of the military.

And wait till unit rotation kicks in, when the army is put on 6 - 12 month unaccompanied tours in idyllic locations like Poland, Bulgaria and Romania w/the family sent stateside to tough out the defunded public school systems and lack of base support.

Clark is Christ-like next to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm not disagreeing...
I was just pointing out that Hackworth won't be supporting Clark. He has been outspoken in his vitriol against Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Who do you think he'll support?
Edited on Tue Sep-16-03 10:40 AM by lebkuchen
...say it goes Dean/Clark and Bush/Cheney?

Chuck Yeager spoke poorly of Neil Armstrong....he thought Armstrong was a lousy pilot. Armstrong got to go to the moon, Yeager didn't. There's always going to be internecine rivalry among the higher ranks. Who better to criticize them?

Hackworth said there was a bleeding of quality soldiers when Clark was in charge. That was when the economy was good, so there were good paying jobs to entice military members outside their military profession.

Now the economy stinks, but that still won't stop the hemorrhaging of soldiers, who will give a thumbs-down to reenlistment as soon as they're able. W/the Iraq debacle, military folk are swearing to get out as soon as the Bushies redeploy them home, whenever that is.

Hackworth wasn't receiving 500 letters a week (or is it per day?) when Clinton and Clark were in charge. He is now.

Next week's Hackworth epistle should be interesting, no? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. The more the American people accept this
the more callous, arrogant and indifferent bush* becomes to the deaths of our troops. Lynn Cheney was parroting the line this morning on ABC, that we have protect our country. As if to say, Saddam attacked America. Jesse Ventura had one good line on Bill Maher friday night.Alot of people support our troops in Iraq, as long as it is'nt their kids. He also said why not draft the bush twins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hackworth was whooping it up on tv
...with all the other warmongers, like the war criminal McCaffrey when it looked like the slaughter in Iraq was "successful."

His critical faculties reasserted themselves when his nightly cable appearances came to an end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's not whooping it up now
BTW, how did Kerry, who supported the war, react--this isn't a rhetorical question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think Col. Hackworth is great.
Edited on Wed Sep-17-03 01:07 AM by w4rma
I hope he'll vocally support the Democratic nominee against Bush in the general election. :)

It sounds like he will support the Democrat. I can't see any reason why he wouldn't. I hope he'll do it vocally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Likely, since the alternative is crawling into the bed of a deserter, who
destroys the military for no good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC