Choose life, okay, but how?
By RICK SALUTIN
Friday, March 25, 2005
What "culture of life"?
snip
"I believe the word "pro-life," used in the case of Terri Schiavo and in the anti-abortion movement, should be taken seriously. I don't think it is just part of a linguistic battle for political advantage: pro-life versus pro-choice. I think pro-lifers are preoccupied with life -- but largely because they are obsessed by death. Not only, or chiefly, the deaths of the unborn or Terri Schiavo, but by a deathliness they sense all around, that leads to panic."
/snip
snip
"What do you do when you sense this kind of deathliness? You can try to confront and change it. But that may lead to frustration, along with a painful admission that many of your leaders are unworthy or ill-motivated. And it implies the wrenching admission that
much of this death never needed to be. Or you decline to confront the pervasive deathliness in its many disturbing forms. Instead,
you panic, focus on isolated symbols, and respond to them in anguish with vague slogans. You Choose Life and demand a tube be put back into Terri Schiavo. It's not surprising that the language of death pulses through this kind of "pro-Life" movement. On TV this week, Terri Schiavo's father referred to "this judge who's on a crusade to kill our daughter.""
/snip
Rick Salutin and I disagree on a lot of things, a fact that no doubt gives him sleepless nights. In this case, however, I believe he has touched on a truth.
This is hypothesis similar to that used by Michael Moore in Bowling For Columbine.
No longer does a President of the US say "we have nothing to fear but fear itself", rather the fear is used as a political tool.
The entire article is here:
<
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050325/COSALU25/TPComment/TopStories>