Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill O'Reilly: murder by number (detainee deaths)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 09:00 PM
Original message
Bill O'Reilly: murder by number (detainee deaths)
By Grace Nearing of Scriptoids

(For the record: The word "murder" appears just once in the New York Times article, as part of a quoted statement. Here it is: "'Homicide is not synonymous with murder (a legal determination) and includes both criminal actions and excusable incidents (i.e., self-defense, law enforcement, combat),' according to an Army statement.")

Big doin's on The O'Reilly Factor. There's a "Factor Investigation" under way. This one is called "Murder Accusations Against U.S. Troops in Iraq & Afghanistan?"

You can tell it's bullshit because the title ends with a question mark. That question mark supposedly exonerates O'Reilly in perpetuity for the flagrantly deceptive practices to follow.

BILL O'REILLY, HOST: In the "Factor Investigation" segment tonight, you may remember that on March 16, "The New York Times" ran a front-page headline which said: "U.S. Military Says 26 Inmate Deaths May be Homicide."


Ah, the game's afoot. The headline uses the word "homicide"; the Factor Investigation uses the term "murder." Can you see where this is going? Bill and his guests are going to have some fun with the terms "murder" and "homicide."

Oh, and they also play some incredibly clumsy games with numbers, because O'Reilly is obsessed with the number "26" here. Like a dogged tax accountant, he's determined to get that figure below a certain cutoff point. He won't be able to do it, but O'Reilly will not be denied his "victory."

Now, “The Factor” came on that same night and said "The New York Times" report was misleading. One of our military analysts, Colonel David Hunt, put the number at four, not 26.


Now this gets to be really funny in a perverse sort of way. O'Reilly thinks he's going to chip away at the number of possible homicides alleged in the NYT article, but by the end of the program he and his guests wind up increasing their estimated number of murders, and they don't do anything to discredit the "26" figure.

Continue reading here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC