Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Witchshaft: A federal court astoundingly upholds religious discrimination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 03:20 AM
Original message
Witchshaft: A federal court astoundingly upholds religious discrimination
A federal court astoundingly upholds religious discrimination
http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2005/052005/05092005/1758588

AMERICANS WHO regret that the United States is not "a Christian country" should explore residential real-estate offerings in Chesterfield County. The Board of Supervisors there has established Judeo-Christianity as the officially favored faith, and--grab those MLS listings!--a federal court has blessed the deal.

The facts of Simpson v. Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors are undisputed. Since 1984 the county has included during its board meetings nonsectarian invocations by various Chesterfield "religious leaders" identified via the phone book. Contacted by mail, interested pastors, priests, rabbis, and imams respond, later giving their public orisons on a first-come, first-served basis. In 2002, Chesterfield resident Cynthia Simpson asked to join the rotation. Ms. Simpson identified herself as a Wiccan--a witch. Chesterfield refused her request, the county attorney explaining, "Chesterfield's nonsectarian invocations are traditionally made to a divinity that is consistent with the Judeo-Christian tradition." Off to court.

Amazingly, a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last month overruled the trial court that had struck down Chesterfield's wiccaphobic policy, and upheld the county. The three judges found that the variety of religious speakers the county had welcomed was diverse enough, and the content of the messages they delivered inclusive enough, that Chesterfield satisfied court precedents regarding legislative prayers. In other words: Since the only kinds of prayers Chesterfield tolerates are generic ones, there's no requirement that every single cult, creed, or coven have a place on the county's devotional roster. If all flavors are vanilla, surely 100 vanilla producers suffice. No need for 101.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. why amazing? this is where we live now.
i'm not surprised or shocked.

angry? yes -- but this is the landsacpe we live in.

then again i'm a lefty with purist political leanings -- who think this shit should never, ever be tolerated even a little bit.
so, who would listen to me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. So they were spinning buddist prayer wheels too?
</sarcasm>

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Technowitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. As a Wiccan, I find this sad, but not at all surprising
True story: Some years back, before I knew my same-sex spouse, she was being interviewed for a security clearance.

The agent didn't ask her a single question about her sexual orientation, or her anti-war activities in the 60s. He did ask her, however, if she sacrificed small animals as part of her religious practices.

She replied, "Are you kidding? I have trouble killing mosquitoes!"

The ignorance of some, and the overt prejudice, can be astounding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC