Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bush-Bolton Plan to Bomb Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 04:54 PM
Original message
The Bush-Bolton Plan to Bomb Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant
The Bush-Bolton Plan to Bomb Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant

by Jude Wanniski
Memo on the Margin, www.wanniski.com May 2005

The Bush-Bolton Plan to Bomb Bushehr

Memo To: Republican Senators
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: With Tony Blair’s Support



Buried down in today’s New York Times report on President Bush reaffirming his unqualified support for John Bolton as U.N. Ambassador is the reason why almost all of you are ready to vote for his confirmation.

“Republicans are hoping to shame Democrats into a quick vote on Mr. Bolton. They argue that he needs to be in place by June so that the United States will have the latitude it needs to press its concerns about Iran`s suspected nuclear weapons program before the Security Council.”
Why the big rush? My reliable sources tell me it is because there is a timetable that makes it urgent for Bolton to be ready for action in June in order to cripple the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as part of the plan to bomb the Iranian nuclear-power plant at Bushehr. That’s because Bushehr, under construction with Russian supervision, will soon be ready to receive the Russian fissile material enabling it to produce power. In 1981, remember Republican Senators, Israel bombed the Osiraq nuclear power plant near Baghdad just before it was to be fueled by its French contractors. Once fueled, bombing is out of the question because of the radiation that would be emitted, with clouds traveling who knows where.


Of course you must know by now that at the time the Israelis blew up Osiraq, the situation was quite different. We were in the midst of the Cold War, the United States was supporting Iraq in its war against Iran, and the Russians were supporting Iran. So when the billion-dollar Osiraq plant went up in smoke (wiThe Bush-Bolton Plan to Bomb Bu.ems th the help of the neo-cons who were already occupying the Pentagon in that first year of the Reagan administration), there was no reaction from Russia because the Israelis were essentially bombing us!! We also know by now that Iraq did not have a nuclear weapons program at the time, but only began its (unsuccessful) clandestine effort after Osiraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent post
Edited on Sat May-14-05 08:39 PM by teryang
With excellent links

The Iran Crisis in Global Context
by Dilip Hiro and Tom Engelhardt

http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=5952

<"The Bush administration has not only refused to adhere to its obligations under the treaty … but has now embarked on what is anathema under the treaty – the production of a new generation of nuclear weapons. These are the new, more compact, nukes the administration says it needs for the so-called war on terrorism. It beggars belief that the administration appears to believe it can succeed in restraining Iran while it proceeds to violate its obligations."> Richard Butler

<"When the nuclear NPT came into force 35 years ago, the central bargain was that non-nuclear-weapons states like us would renounce their right to develop nuclear weapons while retaining the inalienable right to undertake research into nuclear energy and to produce and use it for peaceful purposes … while the five declared nuclear-weapon states reduced and then eliminated their nuclear weapons
."

By now, it has become crystal clear that this bargain has not been – and will not be – kept. The New Agenda Coalition criticized the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for spending all its time and energy monitoring and enforcing compliance by non-nuclear-weapon countries suspected of wanting to develop such weapons, while overlooking the obvious – that the nuclear powers have not implemented the commitments they made at the NPT review conferences of 1995 and 2000 .

For instance, in 2000 the U.S. government pledged to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty but has not done so yet and shows no signs that it will. It also promised to sign a verifiable accord to end the production of new fissile material for nuclear weapons but has failed to do so. To make matters worse, the Bush administration has been trying for two years to get Congressional authorization to fund research on a new generation of nuclear weapons including small yield mini-nukes and nuclear bunker busters. It has also mandated nuclear labs in the U.S. to come up with ways of upgrading the present nuclear arsenal by making it more robust and longer lasting.>

The real target is two fold, destroy the Iranian nuclear industry which offers energy redundance and surplus capital accumulation, the end result of which will be increased Iranian stability, power, and influence. Second, to destabilize the regime and obtain control of its petroleum reserves. Any reading of the American energy industry literature on the development and "productivity" of Iranian oil fields reveals a thinly disguised desire to recapture the nationalized fields and put them to the efficient use of their former Anglo-American owners. Nuclear power equals increased economic power, namely that to withold petroleum reserves from the world market and obtain top dollar for what is sold. Those top dollars will result in Iranian power on the second tier scale of nations such as France, England and Germany. This is something that the neo-cons can't stomach. An Islamic nation with power projection capability and consequently a world leadership role.

In fact, the posted links about the "Iranian nuclear crisis" reveals that Iran's emerging power and that of the "third world" nations following its lead on the NPT controversy, are in fact the beginning of a "new world order" in which the oil companies, the neo-cons, and their Israeli proxies, lose in the shake out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC