Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: "A Sudden Taste For Openness"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:42 AM
Original message
NYT: "A Sudden Taste For Openness"
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/18/opinion/18wed2.html?th&emc=th

A Sudden Taste for Openness

- snip -

It took Newsweek about two weeks to retract its report.

- snip -

The White House and the Pentagon have refused to begin any serious examination of the policymaking that led to the abuse, humiliation, torture and even killing of prisoners taken during antiterrorist operations and the invasion of Iraq. Meanwhile, the administration has stonewalled outside efforts to accomplish that task. No senior officer or civilian official has been held accountable for policies that put every American soldier at greater risk. The men who wrote the memos on legalized torture and evading the Geneva Conventions have been promoted.

If the Pentagon is as enthusiastic about accountability in its own house as its spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita, is when it comes to Newsweek, then it should release the Southern Command's report on Guantánamo Bay, on which the magazine report was based. The administration should also release all the other reports on prisoner abuse it has been withholding, including one by the Central Intelligence Agency about its illegal practice of hiding prisoners from the Red Cross. And it should encourage Senator John Warner, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, to conduct a full investigation of the formation of the policy on prisoners, rather than pressuring him to stop.

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow!
Just WOW. Can anyone point to a harder hitting article in the NYT in the past 6 months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's what I was thinking. Bout time they showed some spine, for a change
It's an editorial, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paul Dlugokencky Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's a start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think the White House is really overreaching with this Newsweek crap
they are making fools of themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. indeed. and they're also drawing attention to their own credibility
Edited on Wed May-18-05 06:32 AM by ixion
by trying to defame the credibility of newsweek. Call it the 'Schiavo Effect'. I hope they continue to do this, because it's making them look bigger idiots than they already are.

There's a scene in Excalibur where Merlin tricks an enchantress into expellilng all her power on to herself while she was in a dream. BushCo is doing the same thing by trying to tell newsweek about being credible, because everyone the world over knows that this administration has 0, that is ZERO credibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. exactly, ixion
the fact that they are never held accountable is one thing. But when they accuse OTHERS of "credibility issues", they draw attention to their OWN credibility. And since there's absolutely NONE there, they're making themselves an easy target. Their usual tactic is to create a smokescreen to deter attention AWAY from their own issues. This time they are drawing attention TO THEMSELVES. And they are so corrupt, so arrogant, they are simply unable to stop themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. NYT LttE/Kristen Breitweiser on Newsweek and the Koran Report
To the Editor:

Re "Newsweek Says It Is Retracting Koran Report" (front page, May 17):

I find it ironic that the White House is demanding more than a retraction from Newsweek over its report that American interrogators at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, had tried to unnerve detainees by desecrating the Koran.

Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, said: "The report had real consequences. People have lost their lives. Our image abroad has been damaged."

Mr. McClellan said Newsweek's retraction was a "good first step."

As a 9/11 widow who witnessed worldwide support of the United States after 9/11, now, I witness wide hatred of America.

Such hatred has little to do with the Newsweek article. It has everything to do with the Bush administration's pre-emptive war in Iraq. A war based on dead wrong intelligence that has cost thousands of lives. A war based on faulty reasons that have never been retracted, let alone fully explained to the American people or the world.

Mr. McClellan speaks of journalistic standards. How about executive-branch standards that should be met before taking a country into a false war, a war that has made the entire world less safe?

I am all for accountability and retractions. But such things need to start at the top.

Kristen Breitweiser
Shelter Island, N.Y., May 17, 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. See, NYT can be direct and to the point when it chooses.
A pity they waited so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. It took Newsweek about two weeks to retract its report.
It took the W.H. 2 years to decide it was time to use this story, so the attention could be diverted from the REAL story: the Downing St memo!

We know it, they know it, the rest of the world knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Exactly. Accountability lockstep for all EXCEPT the WH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC