Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Important Election Safeguard [NewYork Times editorial for paper trails!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Vitruvius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 05:56 AM
Original message
An Important Election Safeguard [NewYork Times editorial for paper trails!
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 05:59 AM by Vitruvius
There are many problems with American elections, but none more serious than the rise of paperless electronic voting, whose results cannot be trusted. Grass-roots reformers are in the middle of a two-day lobbying blitz on Capitol Hill in support of a House bill that would require that electronic voting machines in federal elections produce voter-verifiable paper records. It is an important measure that should be passed without delay.

Electronic voting has been rolled out nationwide without necessary safeguards. The machines' computers can be programmed to steal votes from one candidate and give them to another. There are also many ways hackers can break in to tamper with the count. Polls show that many Americans do not trust electronic voting in its current form; such doubts are a serious problem in a democracy.

The solution is to require that each machine produce a paper record that can be inspected and verified by the voter. The paper records are then stored, and can be counted after the polls close. If the results on the machine do not match the tally of the paper records, it will be clear that there is a problem.

The states have taken the lead on electronic voting reform. Nineteen states have paper-trail requirements, including major states like California and Ohio. But a federal law is still badly needed. Any state can cast the deciding electoral votes in a presidential election. Voters across the country are entitled to know that the president was elected on machines that can be trusted. <SNIP>


More at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/10/opinion/10fri3.html

---------- ------------- ---------

Finally, the mainstream media is starting to notice...
And the New York Times is a trend-setter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. so, does that mean we're not all crazy now?
Remember how many editors rebuffed anyone's suggestions to do some reporting on this issue?
Wonder what turned the tide -- the fact that Bush hasn't been above a 50 percent approval rating in months, but "won" another election might have been a hint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lady lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
PLEASE call the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and urge your representative to pass H.R. 550.


(Vitruvius, I accidentally duped your thread after only doing a search for H.R. 550. Sorry.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, not a paper trail!
PAPER BALLOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The electronic records can still be cooked. What good is a paper receipt if it's just going to be ignored?

PAPER BALLOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC