Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

StarTribune: Spinning/Full bore on Wilson-Plame

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:56 PM
Original message
StarTribune: Spinning/Full bore on Wilson-Plame
Latest StarTribune editorial -- they are SLAMMIN' the Bushies!

http://www.startribune.com/stories/561/4130790.html

The White House and its friends are a wonder to behold when they're trying to spin the truth into something more politically convenient. They're going all out on Wilson-Plame-Gate.

<snip>

A prominent part of the spin-and-smear operation is the argument that Wilson was a Clinton appointee and gave money to both Al Gore and John Kerry. As Wilson points out, he was originally appointed by the first President Bush, who held him in high regard, especially for putting his life on the line to shield hundreds of Americans from Saddam Hussein during the Gulf War. And what the spin-and-smear practitioners don't tell is that he also donated to the current President Bush and other Republicans.

Be aware also of the White House effort to turn this whole thing into a general "classified information" issue. It's not. There is classified information -- from confidential to top secret and beyond -- and there's classified information. Blowing the cover of an intelligence operative is both morally and legally indefensible. Consider, too, that Novak used the name "Valerie Plame" when she now goes by Valerie Wilson. She used her maiden name when she worked undercover abroad in what is called "nonofficial" status. That means she wasn't using an embassy cover; she was out on her own, without a safety net for herself or her informants. How many informants were blown by Novak's column?


<snip>

Bush changed the subject, from Wilson-Plame to too danged many leaks in Washington. He didn't say whether a special counsel would be better, and in the end, he fell to meekly asking people to come forward if they have information. What does it take to get Bush fired up and ready to take names and kick backsides? Blowing the cover of a CIA agent apparently doesn't meet that test.

:evilgrin:

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now THAT is going to generate a few letters to my beloved
Star Tribune. I find this sentence particularly interesting:

Be aware also of the White House effort to turn this whole thing into a general "classified information" issue. It's not.

The editorial writer is writing as if she is speaking directly to the reader, and is actually imploring the reader to "be aware". That is a level of involvement that doesn't usually get expressed on the editorial page. The sentence would normally get written like this:

The White House is making an effort to turn this whole thing into a general "classified information" issue. It's not.

Very, very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agates Donating Member (743 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another excellet editorial
from the Star-Tribune.

<snip> The person who blew Plame's cover is columnist Robert Novak, in a July 14 column. What he did was irresponsible in the extreme, and now he's frantically trying to cover his backside. <snip>

I watched Yohack, I mean Novack, stretching to try to cya on Wolf on CNN this afternoon. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebel_with_a_cause Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Outstanding must read
Go MN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francis Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Falling Meekly ?
<< Bush changed the subject, from Wilson-Plame to too danged many leaks in Washington. He didn't say whether a special counsel would be better, and in the end, he fell to meekly asking people to come forward if they have information.

That wasn't my take on this. it's a strategy that was first aired at the WH press conference. It's a challenge to the reporters, they know who leaked and it's the white house saying come forward if you dare
knowing that should the hapless hack come forward his/her career as a political journo is finished
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC