Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The GOP vs. Nepotism? By Timothy Noah, Slate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
fabius Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:56 AM
Original message
The GOP vs. Nepotism? By Timothy Noah, Slate
The GOP vs. Nepotism?
The White House leakers didn't grasp that, to conservatives, "nepotism" is no longer a dirty word.
By Timothy Noah

http://slate.msn.com/id/2089156/

Posted Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 5:25 PM PT


At the heart of the Valerie Plame affair lies an unexamined mystery. What, precisely, did the White House's two phantom leakers think they were accomplishing by telling Robert Novak that their nemesis, Joseph C. Wilson IV, was married to a Central Intelligence Agency specialist on "weapons of mass destruction" who'd recommended that the CIA send Wilson to Niger to check out allegations that Iraq had purchased uranium there? ..."Clearly," said the official, "it was meant purely and simply for revenge."

snip

More likely, Chatterbox thinks, is that the White House leakers (let's call them WHLs) were trying to expose Wilson as a flake by revealing that he got the Niger assignment through nepotism. To a certain mind-set, the notion that a man would depend on his wife to find work for him would be an unspeakable humiliation. Did Norman Maine let Esther Blodgett use her influence to get him one more movie role? Hell, no! He kept his dignity and marched into the sea. (Chatterbox should here point out that Novak reported in his original column that the CIA denied that Plame suggested Wilson for the job; she merely passed along the CIA's invitation. The WHLs apparently believed otherwise.)

If the WHLs were crying "nepotism," they made the additional mistake of being out of touch with the newest conservative thinking about nepotism, as laid out by Bellow (a self-described neoconservative and the son of Nobel Prize-winning novelist Saul Bellow) in his widely praised book. Nepotism, Bellow argues, is by and large good, or at least inevitable. It strengthens family ties, propels the creation of wealth, and provides a necessary check on the barbarities of unchecked meritocracy. Can't those baboons in the Bush White House read?

more...

http://slate.msn.com/id/2089156/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. barbarities of unchecked meritocracy??
That just speaks VOLUMES!!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course, they believe in nepotism and breeding...
The Busheviks are Global Aristocrats, not Americans (they have committed too much treason as a family, from the financing of Hitler to the Smedly Butler Coup against FDR to Watergate, the October Surprise and Iran-Contra, culminating iwth the attempted and Bloodless Coups of the last years of the 20th Century).

They do not believe in the American ideals of the Old Republic. They support breeding over merit every time.

And isn't our Chimply Emperor* a clear example of such?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC