Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Kay: "looking for a smoking gun is a fool's mission."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 10:06 AM
Original message
David Kay: "looking for a smoking gun is a fool's mission."
(This is an article published in the Washington Post last January by David Kay. Reading what Kay said then about the UN weapons inspectors is knee-slapping stuff now.)

January 19, 2003

"It Was Never About A Smoking Gun"

By David Kay

(David Kay is a senior fellow at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies. In 1991, he served as chief nuclear weapons inspector of UNSCOM, the U.N. Special Commission on Iraq.)

When it comes to the U.N. weapons inspection in Iraq, looking for a smoking gun is a fool's mission. That was true 11 years ago when I led the inspections there. It is no less true today -- even after the seemingly important discovery on Thursday of a dozen empty short-range missile warheads left over from the 1980s.

The only job the inspectors can expect to accomplish is confirming whether Iraq has voluntarily disarmed. That is not a task that need take months more. And last week's cache is irrelevant in answering that question, regardless of the U.N.'s final determination. That's because the answer is already clear: Iraqi is in breach of U.N. demands that it dismantle its weapons of mass destruction.

Read entire article

Commentary on this article available on The Mahablog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess we know who the fool is
Kay pronounced on cable tv as the resident "terrorism" expert in late April or early May, right after three key people in the Saddam defense establishment were captured, that we'd "know within 72 hours where the weapons of mass destruction were or there aren't any."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kay got his job because of his loyalty to Bush.
Must be, as it's a plain fact that he's an idiot.

Compare/contrast current Republican spin that Joseph Wilson wasn't "qualified" to go to Niger (even though he'd spent many years there) to look for the Uranium-Iraq connection, and that he was chosen only because he was against Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. For a gun to be smoking...
...it must have been fired.

I've never accepted the notion that finding WMD in Iraq would amount to finding a "smoking gun". It's a gun, period.

We know he had this gun during the first Gulf war, and that he didn't fire it. He was accused of possessing this gun in the 12 years since, yet he didn't fire it or give it to someone else to fire.

We sold him the gun and we encouraged its use against Iranians in the 80's. When he used it against his own people in 1988 we did nothing.

The only real gunsmoke here came from our "shock and awe" invasion, and the lies that made it possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC