Boston Globe Editorial: Rove's Role

August 28, 2005

SOME WHITE House sympathizers have attempted to portray Karl Rove's role in the Valerie Plame scandal as that of a statesman, seeking to provide President Bush with the best information possible on Saddam Hussein's nuclear ambitions so that Bush could set policy based on facts. This has been met with deserved skepticism. Rove's career, even before he became Bush's deputy chief of staff, is rich with reasons to think his motives in helping to identify Plame as a CIA agent were far darker.

After all, Plame's identity was revealed in a Robert Novak column on July 14, 2003, just eight days after her husband, Joseph Wilson, had embarrassed Bush over his Iraq war rationale. And Rove had talked with Novak on July 9.

As John Roberts, the Supreme Court nominee and federal appeals court judge, wrote last month in another context, the fact that ''sometimes dogs do eat homework" is no reason to ignore more-logical explanations.

Rove's record has been consistent. Over 35 years, he has been a master of dirty tricks, divisiveness, innuendo, manipulation, character assassination, and roiling partisanship.

<snip>
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2005/08/28/rove_role/

just the nice side of the bastid...


"Rove's record has been consistent. Over 35 years, he has been a master of dirty tricks, divisiveness, innuendo, manipulation, character assassination, and roiling partisanship."

whalerider

just wondering if the king of smear has any family of his own to care about... i presume its highly unlikely, as he appears to be the kind of man who has to pay just to get a blowjob, much less get laid, but other than that..

Rumors that his wife is a strong liberal and that he's had a long term affair with a lobbyist named Karen Johnson.