Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Incendiary weapons: The big white lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:26 PM
Original message
Incendiary weapons: The big white lie
US finally admits using white phosphorus in Fallujah - and beyond. Iraqis investigate if civilians were targeted with deadly chemical
The Iraqi government is to investigate the United States military's use of white phosphorus shells during the battle of Fallujah - an inquiry that could reveal whether American forces breached a fundamental international weapons treaty.
(snip)
Iraq's acting Human Rights minister, Narmin Othman, said last night that a team would be dispatched to Fallujah to try to ascertain conclusively whether civilians had been killed or injured by the incendiary weapon. The use of white phosphorus (WP) and other incendiary weapons such as napalm against civilians is prohibited.
(snip)
Sir Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said: " The use of this weapon may technically have been legal, but its effects are such that it will hand a propaganda victory to the insurgency. The denial of use followed by the admission will simply convince the doubters that there was something to hide." So far, the fall-out in the US over the revelation has been minimal. But the former president Bill Clinton yesterday told students at the American University of Dubai that he did not agree with invasion of Iraq.
snip)
Peter Carter QC, an expert in international law and chairman of the Bar's human rights committee, said the latest US admissions raised serious concerns about whether white phosphorus was indiscriminately used against civilians. He called for an independent inquiry, possibly through the United Nations, into the use of white phosphorus in Iraq.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/article327543.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's my 2 cents (adjusted for inflation)
It's an old artillery and air power trick. It was used by the AF and Army against the Repub Guard in Gulf 1 for weeks. Hit the enemy! They dive into any shelter. The HE rounds hit, turning a few shelters into smoking holes! The enemy moves out of shelter into open ground and the second wave, anti-personnel weapons.

Someone, (Rummy?) 'cooked up' the idea of using WP as the second part of the attack. Why? Burning bodies is sacrilege for Islamic believers! This is NOT something developed in the field, it is an order from above!!!

And, why 'Shake and bake?' That's undertaker slang for 'CREMATION.'

This is NOT chemical warfare, it's PSYCHOLOGICAL warfare of the sickest kind imaginable! Only a ghoul could invision this!!!

That is was is going on with this tactic! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Would you expect any less from this group?
Whatever the worst case scenario, that's what I expect from these Goons. If they could only see themselves for what they are, we'd be soooo much better off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Completely a coincidence. Slightly off topic.
We were watching an old rerun of M-A-S-H tonight. The doctors were being briefed about a new weapon and how to treat it. White phosphorous. Potter went ballistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC