Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Editorial - Plan: We Win (MUST READ AND RECOMMEND!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:13 AM
Original message
NYT Editorial - Plan: We Win (MUST READ AND RECOMMEND!)
Totally devestating takedown of Dubya's Plan for Victory in the NYT Thursday!!!!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/01/opinion/01thur1.html?hp

Plan: We Win

Published: December 1, 2005

We've seen it before: an embattled president so swathed in his inner circle that he completely loses touch with the public and wanders around among small knots of people who agree with him. There was Lyndon Johnson in the 1960's, Richard Nixon in the 1970's, and George H. W. Bush in the 1990's. Now it's his son's turn.

It has been obvious for months that Americans don't believe the war is going just fine, and they needed to hear that President Bush gets that. They wanted to see that he had learned from his mistakes and adjusted his course, and that he had a measurable and realistic plan for making Iraq safe enough to withdraw United States troops. Americans didn't need to be convinced of Mr. Bush's commitment to his idealized version of the war. They needed to be reassured that he recognized the reality of the war.

...

Americans have been clamoring for believable goals in Iraq, but Mr. Bush stuck to his notion of staying until "total victory." His strategy document defines that as an Iraq that "has defeated the terrorists and neutralized the insurgency"; is "peaceful, united, stable, democratic and secure"; and is a partner in the war on terror, an integral part of the international community, and "an engine for regional economic growth and proving the fruits of democratic governance to the region."

That may be the most grandiose set of ambitions for the region since the vision of Nebuchadnezzar's son Belshazzar, who saw the hand writing on the wall. Mr. Bush hates comparisons between Vietnam and Iraq. But after watching the president, we couldn't resist reading Richard Nixon's 1969 Vietnamization speech. Substitute the Iraqi constitutional process for the Paris peace talks, and Mr. Bush's ideas about the Iraqi Army are not much different from Nixon's plans - except Nixon admitted the war was going very badly (which was easier for him to do because he didn't start it), and he was very clear about the risks and huge sacrifices ahead.

...


Read the whole thing, a total slam on Bush. They stop just an inch short of calling him crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great editorial
thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. We listened to the puppet elections & regimes being set up in Vietnam
W needs to know that we will not accept false wars. We will not accept our kids dying when there was no threat to us.

We were not threatened by Iraq. We removed Hussein. So why are we still there? Who even said the Iraqi people want democracy? If they had wanted it, THEY could have fought for it.

In the meantime, we are rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure while our own is crumbling. Our taxes are shipped overseas while we cut back on our basics to our own needy.

Those who profited? W's corporate globalist friends and partners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Read and Recommended but...
The very last sentence has one word too many in it. It reads:

"A president who seems less in touch with reality than Richard Nixon needs to get out more."

Had I written the piece, I would have omitted the word "more".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Actually, I Disagree
A President less in touch w/ reality than Nixon, most certainly does NOT need to get out more or at all. He needs to be put in a straight jacket, locked up in a dark place and have the key thrown away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. ok
I'll go for that. If he won't get out (as in resign), send for the men with the white coats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. I getcha!
But for one little word, :sigh:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. That was great...thank you for that!
Are they trying to regain some lost ground after the Miss Run Amok debacle? Whatever the reason it was a terrific editorial.

recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. What a bunch of neo-colonial bullshit. Typical NY Times.
"What Americans wanted to hear was a genuine counterinsurgency plan"

What fucking idiocy. It is their country. They are doing a great job of defending it-- despite overwhelming odds against a brutal and technologically surperior military force-- lets admit the defeat of US imperialism there and move on.

Maybe we won't attempt to invade another country for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. "National Strategy for Victory in Iraq"
sounds like
"National Strategy for Low-Cost Perpetual Motion Machine"
or
"National Strategy for Conquest and Inhabitation of Kuiper Belt in the Outer Solar System"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. More like half an inch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebelry Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Great editorial, somehow I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. My computer will NOT display this article..I can get the NYT..but this
article fails to load and continues to say 'page cannot be displayed' I even tried from KOS..and through other editorials, but this one just refuses to allow me to read it..but I am going to kick and recommend anyway, cause from what I can read it is excellent and I will not stop trying till I get to read the whole damned thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Dang, that's some good readin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. "If there was something secret about that plan, we can't figure out what
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 11:21 AM by BlueEyedSon
it is."

:rofl:

Did you read the strategery doc/pdf? It's like a 5th grade (I'm being charitable) book report of the document it purports to be....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. "A president who seems less in touch with reality than Richard Nixon needs
to get out more."

Thank you, NYT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. "a rehash of the same tired argument " KICK THIS TO THE TOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Out more"..yeah, out of
his Bubble.

"A president who seems less in touch with reality than Richard Nixon needs to get out more."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. El Rushbozo was complaining about this editorial, so it's got to be good.
Bozo said he wouldn't even read from it.

Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think the article presents Bush in a more positive light...
than he deserves.

Example 1: "Americans don't believe the war is going just fine, and they needed to hear that President Bush gets that".

Nah, I don't think most Americans give a rat's ass what the twerp "gets" or doesn't "get". It's way beyond that. I think most Americans realize we have a nutcase with borderline intellectual functioning in the WH and we're in deep shit on countless fronts until he's gone.

Example 2: "They wanted to see that he had learned from his mistakes and adjusted his course...".

Again, this isn't a matter of a president who needs to tweak his attitude/approach so we can all breathe a sigh of relief that we're on the right track. We won't breathe easy until this incompetent weasel is out of the WH altogether. We have a sinister idiot running our country into the ditch and there's NOTHING that will fix that short of burying the neocon agenda and tossing this loser out of the WH altogether.

Ultimately they present the false impression of how bad this asshole really is by leaving a subtle psychological impression that he just needs to tweak his message to make things right. No... this twerp has us in so damned deep (on so many fronts) that it will take a lot of very smart and decent people years and years to dig out of the mess he and his co-conspirators have created. This editorial is like a passenger suggesting that the driver of a car heading for the edge of a cliff should change the radio channel and adjust the air conditioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wrong fight against the wrong people at the wrong time...
...and all Captain Unelected can think of is "stay the course."

What a sociopathic nutball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm surprised the NYT editors can write this
It must be hard to type when your hands are covered with blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. this is a great article and I like this line
A president who seems less in touch with reality than Richard Nixon needs to get out more.

It does seem as though they are calling him crazy and then throwing in the Nebuchadnezzar reference was good.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. All I can say is Wow
It's music to my ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC