Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MEDIA ADVISORY: Bush Uranium Lie Is Tip of the Iceberg

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 12:33 PM
Original message
MEDIA ADVISORY: Bush Uranium Lie Is Tip of the Iceberg
Edited on Sun Jul-20-03 07:18 AM by Skinner
FAIR-L
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
Media analysis, critiques and activism

MEDIA ADVISORY:
Bush Uranium Lie Is Tip of the Iceberg
Press should expand focus beyond "16 words"

July 18, 2003

Five months later, the truthfulness of one claim in George W. Bush's State
of the Union address has become the focus of growing media scrutiny. The
attention media are paying to this single assertion should be part of a
larger journalistic inquiry into other misstatements and exaggerations
that have been made by the Bush administration about Iraq.

In the January 28 speech, Bush claimed that "the British government has
learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of
uranium from Africa." That assertion was similar to claims made
previously by administration officials, including Secretary of State Colin
Powell (CBS Evening News, 12/19/02), that Iraq had sought to import
yellowcake uranium from Niger, a strong indication that Saddam Hussein's
regime was reconstituting its nuclear weapons program.

In fact, the Niger story, as documented by journalist Seymour Hersh (New
Yorker, 3/31/03) and others, was based on crudely forged documents. In
addition, the administration's own investigation in March 2002 concluded
that the story was bogus. As one former State Department official put it,
"This wasn't highly contested. There weren't strong advocates on the
other side. It was done, shot down" (Time, 7/21/03).

Bush's use of the Niger forgeries has received considerable media
attention in recent days. Much of this reporting has been valuable, and
some outlets have broadened the inquiry beyond one passage in a speech.
The Washington Post's Walter Pincus, for example, suggests (7/16/03) that
the uranium claim remained in the State of the Union address because
"almost all the other evidence had either been undercut or disproved by
U.N. inspectors in Iraq."

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here is a link to Fair
The article is an email with no link that was sent to me as a subscriber. They have some interesting things at this link:
http://www.fair.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I remember a time when FAIR reports showed up in the mainstream media
from time to time. I guess lately the truth hurts too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-03 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Or the tip of the tip since an iceberg is only 90% under
water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-03 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. roughsatori
Per DU copyright rules
please post only 4
paragraphs from the
news source.

Thank you.

NYer99
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC