Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forcing fuel efficiency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 02:00 PM
Original message
Forcing fuel efficiency
Nature abhors a vacuum, but politics fills it. That's what is happening on global warming and fuel efficiency. The Bush administration and Congress have refused to act on either issue, so the states are doing it for them.

New York and Massachusetts are the latest to consider adopting California's auto-emissions standard, which is tougher than federal guidelines. The state rule would reduce carbon dioxide emissions and indirectly force better mileage. In all, 10 states (and Canada) are planning to follow California's lead.

States have a choice because when the federal government decided to regulate automobile pollution, California was already doing it. So under the law, states can choose either federal or California standards. It isn't a partisan choice. The governors of half of the states looking to California are Republicans.

The auto industry has sued California and threatens to do the same to every state that adopts its rule, but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (also a Republican) vows to defend it strenuously. Obstinacy is a familiar industry response to progress. In 1959, Chrysler objected to mandatory seat belts as "an unnecessary imposition." Seven years later, Henry Ford II called a federal mandate for laminated windshields, collapsible steering columns and shoulder belts "technically unfeasible."



http://www.sptimes.com/2005/12/10/Opinion/Forcing_fuel_efficien.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. so you're saying that fuel efficiency and alternative fuels
are not a worthwhile cause? At all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. When * abrogates Federal responsibility, SOMEONE has to step in.
Edited on Sun Dec-11-05 02:09 AM by eppur_se_muova
Typical Repug strategy is to cripple Federal efforts and then turn the whole thing over to "the private sector" = bigtime Repug donors "because the government approach isn't working". But for-profit isn't the only alternative to Federal programs. Expect to see more state and local governments, as well as nonprofits, take over where the * maladministration has failed to act.

edited for syntax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. vehicles not covered by CAFE, are the problem
SUVs are the problem, not cars that get 25 MPG

please, stop pushing people into SUVs

there ain't all that much efficiency left to be got
...tire drag, air drag... will always be with us.

go after the vehicles that get 10 MPG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC