Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RW Shill (Kathleen Parker) turns on GOP (re Abramoff)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:40 AM
Original message
RW Shill (Kathleen Parker) turns on GOP (re Abramoff)
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060110/1052664.asp

excerpt:

Meanwhile, there's a critical difference between "directly" and "indirectly." What "indirectly" means is that many Democrats accepted funds from the Florida-based law-lobbying firm Greenberg Traurig, to which Abramoff once belonged. He "left" the firm when his questionable practices with Indian tribes were first reported. That Greenberg Traurig should give campaign funds to Democrats is far less surprising than that the firm would hire Abramoff in the first place. One of Greenberg Traurig's partners, after all, is Marvin Rosen, who was (cue ironic music here) Democratic National Committee finance chairman for Clinton-Gore in 1996.

See what I mean about the giant jigsaw? Or, to mix metaphors, webs don't get much more tangled than this, which may be why no one in the media has put it all together until now.

What's clear is that however the Republican Party tries to spin it, this is a huge deal, and it's primarily a huge Republican deal. It's also becoming increasingly clear that the ripple effects of Abramoff's corruption could alter the political landscape come the midterm elections and possibly far into the future.

As one Democratic insider said to me in December, just before the Abramoff plea story broke: "For Democrats, it's beginning to look a lot like Christmas."

...more at link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very Cool.. I Miss Honesty
and appreciate it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimpossible Donating Member (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. I almost spit my coffee when I saw it
Very refreshing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. I do not think most of media has even tried to put it together-Parroting

RW talking points is easy.

..See what I mean about the giant jigsaw? Or, to mix metaphors, webs don't get much more tangled than this, which may be why no one in the media has put it all together until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Democrats are tied to Abramoff the same way I am tied to Clarence
Thomas . . . the six degrees of Kevin Bacon syndrome . . .

Me - Rob Boston of AU - Bill O'Reilly - Rush Limbaugh - Clarence Thomas (who officiated at one of RL's many marriage attempts) . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. She's RW, but not a shill
Sometimes she's predictably RW, sometimes not. I like her even if I often don't agree with her politics.

We all should read some opinion columns from the other side of the spectrum unless we want to be kool-aid drinkers, and one can do worse than Parker. A lot worse.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC