Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN banned fr Iran-translation blooper?-Not

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 04:48 PM
Original message
CNN banned fr Iran-translation blooper?-Not
excerpt from: http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/01/16/iran.cnn/index.html

...IRNA reported Monday that the Iranian government banned CNN journalists from working in the country after a translation error broadcast by CNN mistakenly quoted Iran's president as saying his nation has the right to build nuclear weapons.

CNN was not informed directly by the Iranian government that it was banned from the country.

The dispute arises from a moment of simultaneous translation Saturday.

As Ahmadinejad was speaking, an interpreter working for a translation company hired by CNN misquoted him as having said Iran has the right to build nuclear weapons. In fact, he said Iran has the right to nuclear energy, and that "a nation that has civilization does not need nuclear weapons." He added, "our nation does not need them."

The incorrect translation was re-broadcast on CNN later Saturday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. So Iran Has No Balls Either, Huh?
They ban CNN, then decide a day later to let them back in? Wow, I'm sure CNN is shaking in their boots.

Perhaps somebody better tell Iran that CNN has no problem making this mistake again, and who butters their bread. Does Iran actually believe they have anything to gain from giving CNN another chance?

I'm not defending Iran, but I think that it's peculiar they're relenting on their threat to ban CNN, especially when CNN most likely intentionally changed their words. Oooopppps! We made a mistake. We meant nuclear ENERGY, not nuclear weapons. Understandable error, they're pretty close to the same thing ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "weapons" and "energy"...mis-take by design
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC