Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Founders didn't think 'trust me' was enough

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:48 PM
Original message
Founders didn't think 'trust me' was enough
.. Besides, as President Bush put it Thursday after the latest details of the government's domestic surveillance program were exposed, "the privacy of ordinary Americans is fiercely protected in all our activities."

Pardon our skepticism, but we're not buying that at face value. Our system of government doesn't, either. The founders wisely built checks and balances into it.

The executive branch deserves some legal leeway in times of war, but this administration has taken that to mean it shouldn't be second-guessed. It has even shut out its own Justice Department, which called off its probe of NSA phone tapping because its lawyers weren't allowed security clearance ..

The president, the attorney general and others have insisted that the government's "terrorist surveillance program" was limited to tapping phone calls to and from points overseas. But USA Today revealed Thursday that the calling records of tens of millions of U.S. households and businesses had been compiled in an NSA database. The agency reportedly analyzes those records to identify suspicious calling patterns but does not listen in on or record individual telephone conversations - which doesn't mean it couldn't ..

http://heraldnet.com/stories/06/05/14/100edi_editorial001.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. too bad the media does not smack them back with the checks and
balances response!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Example of how Bush's Administration protects confidential data

Valerie Plame

If they get their hands on it, they'll use it for political purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree Spinzonner, how much evidence
does this Sergeant Schultz congress need to do their job and protect the Constitution from being turned in to toilet paper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC