Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US faces eviction from Kyrgyzstan (Our Last Mil Base in Central Asia.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:44 AM
Original message
US faces eviction from Kyrgyzstan (Our Last Mil Base in Central Asia.)
US facility faces eviction from Kyrgyzstan
By Isabel Gorst in Osh
Published: May 19 2006 18:49 | Last updated: May 19 2006 18:49

Kyrgyzstan warned on Friday that the US risked eviction from its last military base in central Asia unless it agreed to a 100-fold increase in rental for aircraft landing and refuelling facilities at Manas outside the capital Bishkek.

Kurmanbek Bakiyev, the Kyrgyz president, said the US must pay $200m (€156m, £106m) a year, up from $2.7m, for the use of Manas, which was set up in 2001 as a launch pad for US-coalition forces operations to overthrow the Taliban in Afghanistan. He said there would be “no room for haggling” in the next round of talks with the Pentagon opening in Bishkek next week.

Mr Bakiyev said that the ending of the war in Afghanistan had removed justification for US military presence in Kyrgyzstan.

Mr Bakiyev’s remarks will raise concern about the US ability to maintain influence in central Asia at a time of growing instability in several states in the region including Kyrgyzstan, which has slid into crime and banditry since a revolution last year ended the 14-year rule of President Askar Akayev.

Last year Uzbekistan expelled the US from a base on its territory.

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/7e3665dc-e75e-11da-9046-0000779e2340.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmmm, bush should just use some of that 'capital' he boasted
about....oh,.....wait a minute.....he doesn't have any capital left, monetarily, politically, domestically or internationally.

Where it once was politically wise to ally oneself with the U.S, the opposite now seems to be occurring. Domestically, even the repubs are trying to distance themselves from the bush admin, internationally, former friendly countries are distancing themselves from the bush admin aka the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. What I find really interesting about this article is what it doesn't say.
Can you say Trans Caspian Pipeline? Just a pet theory of mine.
We never seem to allude to our energy jones when we commit force
to insure it's supply. Oil is never officially mentioned to this day as
a reason for messing with Iraq or threatening Iran.
Instead of fighting for OUR oil we are fighting for democracy.
Shouldn't the economists be commenting on how the price of
democracy is now above $70 a barrel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why "Trans Caspian Pipeline"?
Kyrgyzstan being quite a distance from the Caspian, and not being a major producer of oil or gas (though they are looking for more oil, it's true), what has the country to do with a trans Caspian pipeline?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not so much Kyrgyztan, but the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization)
China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan are all members and of course is interested in the gas pipeline. The SCO meet last week to discuss admitting India, Pakistan, Mongolia, and Iran into the SCO. Next month the Shah of Iran will be meeting with them in Shanghai.

Yes it is all about the power of oil and while the US is losing friends, the other side is amassing theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, it's pretty obvious the US
won't be able to afford the "rent" on this base, since the rent went up 100-fold. And it's obvious Mr. Bakiyev 'the landlord' is not going to go for any negotiations here.

The US can't afford these price hikes. We're broke as it is.

I think once the other countries hear about this, they're going to raise the rent, as well. after all, we're blowing $8 billion per month in Iraq. What's a few millions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC