Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Labour used Bush's tactics to get Blair elected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:57 PM
Original message
How Labour used Bush's tactics to get Blair elected
How Labour used Bush's tactics to get Blair elected

Melissa Kite, Deputy Political Editor
(Filed: 21/05/2006)



Labour used focus groups to track public response to Michael Howard


Tony Blair modelled his general election campaign on President George W Bush and regarded Sen John Kerry as weak, the Prime Minister's personal pollster has revealed.
Philip Gould makes the admission in a discussion paper presented at a New Labour retreat this weekend, attended by Mr Blair and his closest allies, including Peter Mandelson. A copy of the paper has been seen by The Sunday Telegraph.

It will infuriate traditional Labour MPs, who will see it as confirmation of the speed and ruthlessness with which Labour's senior figures abandoned a long-time alliance with America's Democrats in favour of the Republicans under President Bush.
Entitled How to Campaign When the World Won't Stop, the document provides an insight into Labour's 2005 election strategy - a "remorseless" focus on the economy, to the exclusion of virtually everything else. A record £18 million was spent on the campaign.

snip

The disclosures will confirm the suspicions of New Labour's critics that principles are subsumed to strategy and that everything is decided by focus groups. Lord Gould confirms the pre-eminence of strategists such as himself, saying that they are "not spectators", but "actors" who "re-write the script".

But it is his comments on President Bush's second-term victory that will cause the most disquiet in the Labour Party. He writes: "Bush grabbed the campaigning moment and blended robustness of message with maximum personalisation and individuation.
"The unremitting focus on one message - national security - gave certainty and confidence in a world of insecurity."
By contrast, he says of the Kerry campaign: "Sen Kerry was trapped by ambivalence - not certain about the war, he found it hard to appear certain about anything else. We had to be Bush, not Kerry, not in any way in our values, but in our remorseless determination to choose a course and to stick to it, however rough.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. You mean they hired Diebold?
Edited on Sun May-21-06 02:36 PM by AnOhioan
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Focus groups, sophisticated polling, bribes for campaign cash and
lying about the opponent.

We've already seen this movie on this side of the pond. Several times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tony Blair sold his soul to the devil.
Voters want Blair in the dock over loan scandal

By Patrick Hennessy and Melissa Kite
(Filed: 21/05/2006)


The police investigation is expected to last well into autumn this year



Tony Blair should face criminal charges over the "cash for honours" scandal if Scotland Yard's investigation finds that Labour broke the law, voters believe.

A survey for The Sunday Telegraph shows that 54 per cent of those polled believe seats in the House of Lords were offered in return for secret loans or donations to Labour, or for funding of the Government's City Academies programme. Only 28 per cent believe they were not.

snip

They are concentrating their inquiries on the £14 million of secret loans obtained by Labour last year. The money went to fund the 2005 election campaign, which cost £18 million and included an array of sophisticated polling techniques.

Of those who agreed to lend the party money, four were subsequently nominated by Mr Blair for a peerage. Dr Chai Patel, Sir David Garrard, Barry Townsley and Sir Gulam Noon lent a total of £5 million. All their nominations were later blocked by the appointments commission.

snip



Gee, wonder if Tony Blair and Jack Abramoff are on a first name basis....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desperadoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. New Labour - DLC
New Labour - DLC
DLC - New Labour
New Labour - DLC
DLC - New Labour

The only difference is that New Labour actually has won some elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. "choose a course and to stick to it, however rough"
It doesn't matter whether the course it right or wrong, for the party or the country, to Gould - it's winning that counts.

For more of Gould's wisdom and morality, see my signature. I think he may be Blair's succubus (or incubus - I'm not sure how to use the metaphor in a male-male situation). Or perhaps Wormtongue. Though that may be giving Blair too much credit - he may have been amoral for all his life, and Gould has just been attracted to him as a kindred spirit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmkramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. A better and more accurate analogy
would be Clinton's 1992 "It's the economy, stupid." campaign.

By the way, Ann Richards has said that the main reason Bush beat her -- even though she was a very popular incumbent -- was that he stuck to one theme over and over and over and didn't deviate from it. Blair's not saying anything different.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC