Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The symptoms of oil withdrawal- San Francisco Chronicle - 5/28/2006

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 02:15 PM
Original message
The symptoms of oil withdrawal- San Francisco Chronicle - 5/28/2006
The symptoms of oil withdrawal, Ely Ratner, Naazneen Barma - San Francisco Chronicle - 5/28/2006
It has become fashionable in Washington to declare that the United States must end its "addiction" -- as President Bush put it in his latest State of the Union speech -- to foreign oil. Advocates of energy independence argue that U.S. dollars are propping up oppressive regimes in the Middle East, fomenting the rise of radical fundamentalism. Reducing our demand for oil, they say, will suck these "petrocracies" dry, paving the way for democracy.

But we shouldn't be so smug about the foreign policy consequences of energy independence. Though the domestic benefits of an alternative energy policy are clear, it is likely that breaking free from Middle Eastern oil will intensify, not reduce, the national security threats facing the United States.

Rosy scenarios that long for the demise of "petrocracy" rest on shaky ground. Consider what would happen in the Middle East if Americans drastically reduced their spending on foreign oil. Other gas guzzlers would almost certainly take the place of the United States as the region's most important trading and strategic partner. China is already taking on this role with relish, and oil producers are welcoming it with open arms. In Saudi Arabia, the red carpet was rolled out for Chinese President Hu the very next day after he was treated like a second-class citizen by the Bush administration. It is hard to believe that democracy will prevail in a world in which the Saudis are in bed with the Chinese instead of the Cheneys. It goes without saying that the United States would lose much of its influence and leverage in the region.

On the other hand, if the current regimes were successfully starved of their much coveted petrodollars, the Middle East could become a region of weak, failing and failed states, akin to parts of Africa that have all but been abandoned by the international community. If we were to pull the rug out from under the ruling regimes, who would support the restless populations accustomed to a social-safety net derived from oil? Democratic experiments in the Gaza Strip and Afghanistan provide sobering illustrations of what democracy looks like without the resources to support it. Nature may abhor a vacuum, but terrorists, sex traders and drug pushers certainly don't.

---snip---

Ely Ratner and Naazneen Barma are Ph.D candidates in political science at UC Berkeley and research associates at the New Era Foreign Policy Center.




The gist is
  • The end of US petro-dollars to the Saudis will create a void.
  • The void will be fill by religious power centers - which might initially be popularly elected.
  • It is "wishful thinking" for the US to believe that energy independence "...will happily coincide with an end to repression and the flourishing of democracy."


Post for discussion. I happen to think the opposite is the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. oil
If we're not dependent upon these Middle Eastern countries for oil, who cares what kinks of governments they adopt? It's a free world. Less importation of oil to the US, however might help stop the hemorraging of wealth out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The op-ed is counter-intuitive (I have been in the energy industry)
Edited on Sun May-28-06 08:23 PM by Coastie for Truth
I can not make any sense out of it. Which is why I posted it.

My wife thinks it's a prank - to see if a major metro newpaper would publish it. (I took an econ elective many years ago where the prof issued a challenge - if you got an op-ed or a LTTE published in the NY Times - you got an A in the course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If rich do not control Mideast oil, the religious leaders will control it
Edited on Sun May-28-06 08:26 PM by papau
You must support the rich because they're all that stands between us and "unstable" governments controlled by religious leaders -

well - it makes for a great scare I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Basically the Bush-Cheney-Neocon-PNAC argument
And the "rich" should be Bush's buddies.

Fifteen years ago the meme was"You must support the rich because they're all that stands between us and "unstable" governments controlled by Marxists" -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL - but sadly n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Bush-Cheney-PNAC-Neocon argument
American working families have to keep subsidizing the Saudi Royals, at $70/bbl, because the Saudi Royals bailed Bushie out when Harkin Oil went belly up --- and that bad ole commie, Hugo Chavez, didn't bail Bushie out.


Makes "Bushie" sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC