Afghanistan: Our other Mideast disaster...

Kabul under Curfew after Anti-US, anti-Karzai Riots
Submitted by davidswanson on Thu, 2006-06-01 15:58. Media
14 Dead, over 100 Wounded, 50 Killed in US Airstrike

by juan cole, indybay.org

"We have conducted a thorough assessment of our military and reconstruction needs in Iraq, and also in Afghanistan. I will soon submit to Congress a request for $87 billion. The request will cover ongoing military and intelligence operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, which we expect will cost $66 billion over the next year. This budget request will also support our commitment to helping the Iraqi and Afghan people rebuild their own nations, after decades of oppression and mismanagement. We will provide funds to help them improve security. And we will help them to restore basic services, such as electricity and water, and to build new schools, roads, and medical clinics. This effort is essential to the stability of those nations, and therefore, to our own security. Now and in the future, we will support our troops and we will keep our word to the more than 50 million people of Afghanistan and Iraq."
- George W. Bush

The Bush administration is in the midst of "imperial overstretch" on a grand scale. Taking on al-Qaeda and the Taliban, convincing Pakistan to change its policies, and reconstructing Afghanistan would have been a tough enough job. It might not have been possible even with the investment of enormous resources and personnel. Afghanistan is large and rugged and desperately poor. Bad characters are still hiding out in the region, who have proved that they can reach into the United States and hit the Pentagon itself.

Instead of doing the job, Bush ran off to Iraq almost immediately. Even as our brave troops were being killed at Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan in spring of 2002, Centcom commander Tommy Franks was telling a visiting Senator Bob Graham that the US "was no longer engaged in a war in Afghanistan" or words to that effect, and that military and intelligence personnel were being deployed to Iraq. The US troops in Afghanistan would have been shocked and disturbed to discover that in the Centcom commander's mind, they were no longer his priority and no longer even at war! As for money, Iraq has hogged the lion's share. What has been spent on reconstruction in Afghanistan is piddling.

The rest is at: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/11365

The US has really set itself up for some all time historic failures and embarrassments. Time is on the side of the Taliban.

And these invasions were supposed to show the unchallenged supremacy of U.S. might and influence.

The reason these guys like things like the 'war on drugs' and 'war on terror' is because THEY'VE NEVER FINISHED A FRIKIN' THING IN THEIR LIVES. They don't know how to complete a process because they've never done it. It has to be on-going, perpetually, or they get tired of it and just walk away. Just like Cheney's college career, and *'s NG service.

Exactly. George Orwell was oh-so-right: "It's not a matter of whether the war is not real, or if it is, Victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won, it is ment to be continuous. Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance."