For several years, I've worried that the GOP's bigwigs would ignite a new race war when they got desperate. They would start attacking America's Black Muslim population as dangerous, hate radio would take it up, the Mighty Wurlitzer would push it, and we would have a demonized and feared minority population and a stupid frightened electorate again.
One of the people laying the groundwork for this plan is Charles Wendell Colson, Nixon's hatchetman. He has been writing about the Black Muslims in America's prison system for years and how al Quaida is "recruiting and training" in our gulags.
Here's a link to a major article in the Catholic journal "First Things" -- the same publication in which he advocated violence against the judiciary a few years earlier.
http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0211/opinion/colson.htmlExcerpt:
"Consider: You’re black, and you believe you’re being oppressed by the white power structure. Along comes a person of color who invites you to join the brotherhood—the most appealing aspect of Islam in prisons—and offers you a means of striking back at your oppressors. If, on top of that, prisoners are taught that the more aggressive they are, the more favor they gain with Allah, you have a dangerous mix.
How can we prevent the transformation of petty criminals into professional terrorists? Prison officials must be vigilant, but balanced. They need to be on the lookout for anyone preaching violence, and they ought to run out anyone, Christian or Islamist, who condones it. Court decisions give them sufficient legal authority to do this.
A generation ago, wardens were forced to deal with radical religious teaching involving both white supremacist and Black Muslim groups. In O’Malley v. Brierley (1973) prison officials were supported in preventing two priests from leading religious activities in a prison after they conducted what was described as an “Afro-American Mass” attended mostly by the prison’s Black Nationalists and Black Panthers. The prison officials charged that the Mass had been a political rally, not a religious service, and that the priests’ activities were likely to have incited violence. According to the Becket Fund, a nonprofit legal institute that litigates on behalf of Christians, Muslims, and Jews, “the court held that in determining whether the inmates’ rights had been violated, state authorities were to be held only to a reasonableness test and were not required to prove that presence of clergymen constituted a clear and present danger to the prison.”