|
Edited on Sun Aug-27-06 11:03 AM by Peace Patriot
approach that Israel has taken to establish and maintain its existence, which has met something of a "Waterloo" in Israel's recent failed effort to exterminate Hezbollah. Kroeger says this approach has failed to achieve security or peace for Israel. The article is mostly about the Palestinians--whose injury by Israel is the cause behind Hezbollah and much of the anti-US/anti-Israel sentiment in the Middle East and among Muslims worldwide. I want to comment on this (his dwelling on the Palestinians) after I quote some of the Kroeger article. He writes: "So what now, Israel? What kind of future do you have to look forward to? The Wall is not going to protect you from long-range missile attacks. Some day, the enemies you have made will obtain nuclear weapons. What happens to your security then? Do you want peace with your neighbors, Israel, or do you not? Maybe, just maybe, this little wake-up call will prompt Israel’s opinion-makers to begin reflecting at length on the virtues of a fresh, new approach to peace negotiations with the Palestinians. After all, they’ve spent fifty-eight years relying on their Tough Guy approach and it hasn’t worked. "Perhaps it would help if they began by re-examining the most fundamental aspects of their situation. Forget about the immediate threats that you perceive at the moment, Israel, and ask yourselves what kind of peace would you ideally like to experience in the future? Do you want to arrive at a point where you are actually able to live without fear? Do you want to some day see smiles on the faces of your Palestinian neighbors? Do you want to feel a warmth of Good Will radiating from their hearts? If that’s what you want, then you are going to have to try a much different approach from the one you’ve been embracing. "EXTREME GENEROSITY "In order for the Palestinian people to ‘let go’ of all the bitterness and resentment they feel now and start having positive feelings of friendliness for the Israelis, it is absolutely essential that they be able to walk away from the negotiations table feeling as though they had won a tremendous victory. They need to end up with a settlement that is so incredibly generous, and so filled with face-saving Israeli concessions, they won’t be able to contain their joy at their good fortune. They need to feel as though they have won a great victory and their Muslim sympathizers around the world need to see that the Palestinians are delighted with their good fortune.
"What the Israeli people need to understand is that this is the kind of Peace Settlement they are going to want the Palestinians to end up with because it is the only kind of settlement that is going to give them the Lasting Peace—-the freedom from fear—-that they truly want. They need to change the hearts of the Palestinians with something dramatic. The Israelis will know that they have finally achieved true peace when they start seeing smiles on the faces of the Palestinian people, smiles that reflect authentic feelings of gratitude and friendliness toward them."
-------------------------------------------------------------------
My comment: What about Iran?
Kroeger also goes into the history of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, and the U.S. part in it. He says, in addition to extreme generosity to the Palestinians--whose lands were stolen at the point of a gun in 1948, just as surely as Native Americans' lands were stolen--the U.S. should apologize to the Palestinian people for ITS part in supporting this injustice. Kroeger's goal is Palestinian recognition of Israel (although a slightly reduced Israel) and peace for Israel and the Middle East.
I agree with Kroeger for the most part. But I think some additional elements are needed to achieve true peace--primarily the ouster of the Bush Cartel from the Middle East. The Bush junta fostered this Israeli attack on Lebanon--with about as much common sense and wisdom as the Bushite invasion of Iraq. Israel may be in a bad spot--a small, vulnerable country with a militaristic attitude which is constantly exacerbating its problems (a medieval fortress, bristling with armaments, surrounded by hostile neighbors, and trying to be a democracy--quite untenable)--but the Bush regime is far worse, has magnified all of Israel's problems, has brought all out war, chaos and instability to the Middle East, and has BAD MOTIVES. REALLY bad motives. Israel's rightwing leadership has permitted Israel to become the tool of the most despised regime on earth--despised by its own people (70% of whom want to be rid of Bush, and who have had Bush imposed on them by means of stolen elections), and despised by the world. Israel's bombing of Beirut, and invasion of Lebanon, was done at THEIR instigation. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld & Co. And THEY care not at all for Israel. Their goals are MORE MONEY and MORE POWER. They will abandon Israel in a cold minute, if they see profit in it. They don't care for ANYBODY--not even Americans. And they certainly don't care for the welfare and common good of Middle Eastern peoples.
A poll recently posted here at DU revealed that EIGHTY-FOUR PERCENT of Americans oppose any U.S participation in a widened Mideast War. Other polls have shown about 70% want withdrawal from Iraq, either immediate withdrawal (55%) or phased withdrawal (a larger group). This overwhelming disapproval of the Corporate Oil War is an obstacle for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld & Co., whose "Project for a New American Century" (PNAC) calls for total U.S. domination of all Mideast oil fields. Even with Diebold and ES&S putting a 5% to 10% "thumb on the scales" for Bushites and warmongers, in U.S. elections, 84% opposition cannot be ignored. The bombing of Beirut/invasion of Lebanon was Plan B: get Israel to do it. Lebanon is the Bush Cartel's stepping stone to Iran.
And Israel foolishly agreed.
So here's my plan for Israel:
1. Kroeger is right. Give the Palestinians back some of their land and a more than generous settlement.
2. An apology is in order, but not of the U.S. toward the Palestinians. The U.S. under Bush is 'persona non grata' at this point. Who cares what they say? Utter hypocrites, mass murderers, torturers, and greedbags, and a menace to the Middle East. Israel may want to apologize to the Palestinians as part of a settlement--or not. Wounds may be too fresh for an apology (and an apology doesn't matter--and is, in any case, implied by a generous settlement). But who Israel REALLY needs to apologize to is the IRANIAN people. Iran is not just the powerhouse among Israel's neighbors, Israel committed a grave injustice against the Iranian people, in joining with the U.S. in 1954 to topple Iran's democracy, and inflict the Iranian people with 25 years of torture and oppression under the horrible Shah. THAT is what drove the Iranians--the most potentially progressive people among Israel's neighbors--into the arms of the mullahs. And THAT damage needs to be undone.
3. An Israeli apology to the Iranian people, and the offer of an alliance, for two purposes: a) to throw the Bush Cartel out of the Middle East (for instance, joint effort to stabilize Iraq, to get the U.S. out); and b) future cooperation on REGIONAL security, self-determination for Middle Eastern peoples, and maybe even for a cultural/ecological renaissance. (I am convinced that Israeli culture can make a great contribution to a Middle Eastern renaissance, and is NEEDED in the region, partly for its devotion to democracy, and partly for its religion--to get a good religious dialogue going among all three Father God sects of the same religion--Christianity, Judaism and Islam--to understand why these religions have become the tools of war and death.)
One thing is clear to me: If Israel remains allied with the despised Bush regime, it will not survive--and its dilemma (the hostility around it) can too easily lead to a general conflagration and the extinction of all life on earth. Iran is frightened. It's got a nuke-powered Pakistan on its border; Israel, with nukes and a history of bad behavior toward Iran; and the nutso Bush NeoCons and oil giants lusting to invade Iran, and massing troops, bases and battleships into the region to do so. We are now only a "Gulf of Tonkin" incident away from that disaster. The BUSHITES have turned the area into a tinderbox. Israel is just a tiny country, for all its military and financial power. It is dependent on the U.S. for military aid. The American people are exhausted and have been looted and BANKRUPTED by the Bushites. They could well lose sympathy with Israel over all this. Then Israel would have NO friends in the world, except for the Bush fascists.
Kroeger is right that Israel needs to fundamentally RE-THINK its policies and its position vis a vis the Palestinians, and needs to make a dramatic left turn toward peace. But that dramatic turnabout needs to involve more than the Palestinian situation. Israel needs detente with Iran. And Iran need detente with Israel--and needs the threat of the Bushites' bad intentions removed. So why don't these two culturally rich nations, with their five thousand years of devotion to learning, LEARN something, and get together to create peace and prosperity for all?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Kroeger article: http://nontrivialpursuits.org/WordPress/?p=29
DU discussion: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x231195
|