Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Gather in N.Y. (LIHOP/MIHOP mentioned)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 02:36 AM
Original message
LAT: 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Gather in N.Y. (LIHOP/MIHOP mentioned)
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-conspiracy10sep10,0,5347883.story?coll=la-home-headlines

<snip>

As New York readied for another anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, conspiracy theorists and researchers who belong to a group known as the 9/11 Truth Movement gathered in Greenwich Village. Among them were proponents of the "LIHOP" theory, who believe that members of the government "let it happen on purpose," and the "MIHOP" theory, who hold that government officials "made it happen on purpose."

Polls show that many Americans distrust the government on the subject of Sept. 11. A Zogby International poll taken in May found that 42% believed the government concealed evidence that contradicts official accounts. A Scripps Howard-Ohio University poll taken in August found that 36% believed it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that federal officials allowed the attacks to occur because "they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East."

The theories — especially the notion that the towers fell in a controlled demolition — have become widespread enough to prompt official responses.

Last week, Brigham Young University announced that physics professor Steven E. Jones, co-chairman of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth, would be put on indefinite leave while authorities investigated his claims that the buildings were intentionally demolished using explosives.

"Culturally, as a society, it becomes unhealthy," said Christopher Farrell of the conservative think tank Judicial Watch, which successfully filed suit against the government seeking the release of a video showing American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. The think tank was hoping to put to rest beliefs that the explosion was caused by a missile.

"If an individual demonstrated this sort of behavior, medical health professionals would recommend they treat it," said Farrell, a former military intelligence officer and the organization's director of investigations and research. "There's healthy skepticism, and then there's unhealthy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mr. Farrel, LYING is unhealthy
We're not talking about skeptiscism here. We're talking about physics and chemistry and the FACT that the 'official' story doesn't seem to bother to take these to old sciences into account, and requires the reader to accept that the whole thing was a 'series of unfortunate events', as it were.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Judical watch's video just added fuel to the theory. LOL
We STILL couldn't see an airplane.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is all because the government is so secretive and
the mis-administration never did a full investigation immediately afterwords. Add to that the fact that this WH does really stupid national security things like tell the terrorists when it is safe to fly on US planes by giving them a color coded chart to follow and turning operations of our ports over to the money launderers of the attacks. It appears as if the WH is in with bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They are covering up one or more of three things:
complicity by certain elements within the federal government

colossal mistakes made by federal officials

an actual LIHOP/MIHOP plan including top officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Were they discussing the REAL "Path to 9/11?"
Just askin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's funny how people
dismiss the 9/11 "conspiracy theories" until they actually read up on the discrepancies themselves.

I took David Ray Griffin's "New Pearl Harbor" round to my dad's to try and lend it to him. I had a big argument with him because he was convinved that he'd read everything he needed to know about "conspiracy theories" in the newspaper so he didn't need to read the book. I asked him exactly what conspiracy theories he'd read about and he came up with some strange story about lottery numbers I'd never heard of. Anyway we changed the subject but I left the book at his house.

And guess what? Next time I saw him he'd read the book and learnt a lot from it and now my brother wants to borrow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Changing the world one person at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So many people think they know things when they won't even look
at the evidence. My sister's like that. I think she's scared of the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC