Hack the Vote (Krugman)

Admins, this is an editorial by a well known op/ed writer. He raises points which are news for a lot of people, I think. If you have to kill this thread, do so. It is, in my opinion, news, it should be seen. It talks about our own Bev Harris. :)

Hack the Vote

nviting Bush supporters to a fund-raiser, the host wrote, "I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." No surprise there. But Walden O'Dell — who says that he wasn't talking about his business operations — happens to be the chief executive of Diebold Inc., whose touch-screen voting machines are in increasingly widespread use across the United States.

For example, Georgia — where Republicans scored spectacular upset victories in the 2002 midterm elections — relies exclusively on Diebold machines. To be clear, though there were many anomalies in that 2002 vote, there is no evidence that the machines miscounted. But there is also no evidence that the machines counted correctly. You see, Diebold machines leave no paper trail.

Representative Rush Holt of New Jersey, who has introduced a bill requiring that digital voting machines leave a paper trail and that their software be available for public inspection, is occasionally told that systems lacking these safeguards haven't caused problems. "How do you know?" he asks.

What we do know about Diebold does not inspire confidence. The details are technical, but they add up to a picture of a company that was, at the very least, extremely sloppy about security, and may have been trying to cover up product defects.

Early this year Bev Harris, who is writing a book on voting machines, found Diebold software — which the company refuses to make available for public inspection, on the grounds that it's proprietary — on an unprotected server, where anyone could download it. (The software was in a folder titled "rob-Georgia.zip.") The server was used by employees of Diebold Election Systems to update software on its machines. This in itself was an incredible breach of security, offering someone who wanted to hack into the machines both the information and the opportunity to do so.

n/t

...we can't let it stay in LBN (no editorials allowed). I'm going to move this to the Editorials forum. Thanks for your understanding.

ZenLefty
DU Moderator

some of it (I think) really is news, not op/ed.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=23638

But certainly a more important topic than Mel
Gibson's latest goose-step, so maybe it deserves
two threads. :)