Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Backtracking on Cleaner Air

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 12:54 PM
Original message
Bush Backtracking on Cleaner Air
http://www.misleader.org/daily_mislead/Read.asp?fn=df12052003.html

<snip>

Tuesday, the Bush administration announced its revisions to mercury emission rules emissions, one day before President Bush asserted that "we all share duties of stewardship." The administration's alternative, a cap-and-trade system that was requested by the industry, would allow power plants to buy and sell the right to emit mercury.

While this system already exists with sulfur dioxide, the environmental community points out that pregnant women and young children are vulnerable to mercury exposure, leading to developmental problems. About one out of every 12 women (4.9 million) of childbearing age has unusually elevated levels of mercury, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta."

On the same day that he gave his introductory address to employees of the Environmental Protection Agency, newly installed Environmental Protection Agency administrator Mike Leavitt said of the changes, "Frankly, we're just not satisfied with the level of reduction you get from the mercury MACT, so we're making the dual proposal." But a December 2001 Power Point presentation that then EPA administrator Christie Whitman indicated that the rules being rejected would have reduced emissions from the current 48 tons per year to 5 tons per year by 2007. The new proposal Leavitt's backing, however, calls for a reduction to 34 tons by 20104, and would install regulations "three times less stringent and would take 10 years longer to achieve than reductions critics say are required under the Clean Air Act."
...
Continuing the administration's habit of releasing potentially controversial environmental rules on the eve of holidays, the document was released the day before Thanksgiving.
</snip>

Also, RJK Jr's article on Bush and the environment was printed in part in the British newspaper The Indpendent yesterday.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=469820

Great stuff.

s_m



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSU84 Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. How can he backtrack?
He was never for clean air in the first place....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good point
"Bush rolls back yet another environmental safeguard" is more like it.

s_m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC