Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hawks Meet to Lick Wounds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 12:49 AM
Original message
Hawks Meet to Lick Wounds
by Kenneth R. Bazinet

WASHINGTON - President Bush and some of the most vocal Capitol Hill backers of the Iraq war from both parties gathered yesterday for what an insider described as a group therapy session.

"Or maybe it was more like an intervention," said the source, reconsidering the description. "And the President was grateful and welcoming."

Bush met with a grim-looking gaggle of 14 lawmakers and several White House staffers hours after the Iraq Study Group issued its report urging the President to order an about-face on his Iraq strategy.

"It means a lot to me, and I think it means a lot to the American people, to recognize that there are people in this town who are concerned more about the security of this country than they are about the security of their own political positions," Bush said, according to the insider.

<snip, more>

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1207-08.htm

Bring Them Home!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um, does the source know what an "intervention" is/ means?
Not that I've heard the term much but, the last time I heard it, this was not what an intervention was supposed to look like. (That is, an affirmation that everything is correct in Bush's course of action and that he must stay on it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Point! Had it been an intervention, someone would have slapped w upside the head...
and HARD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, my point exactly.
And frankly I do not think in these terms but, Andy Sullivan said before Nov 7, this isn't an election anymore, it's an intervention.

So I knew something was wrong when this source mentioned the term in that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC