Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP,pg1: U.S. Unit Patrolling Baghdad Sees Flaws in Bush Strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 02:47 AM
Original message
WP,pg1: U.S. Unit Patrolling Baghdad Sees Flaws in Bush Strategy
U.S. Unit Patrolling Baghdad Sees Flaws in Bush Strategy
By Sudarsan Raghavan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, January 12, 2007; Page A01

BAGHDAD, Jan. 11 -- A few hours before another mission into the cauldron of Baghdad, Spec. Daniel Caldwell's wife instant-messaged him Thursday morning. President Bush, Kelly wrote, wanted to send more than 20,000 U.S. troops and extend deployments in Iraq. Eight weeks pregnant, she was worried.

Caldwell, a tall, lean 20-year-old from Montesano, Wash., wondered whether he would miss the birth of his child. He walked outside and joined his comrades of Apache Company, 1st Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, Stryker Brigade. They, too, had heard the news.

Moments before he stepped into his squad's Stryker -- a large, bathtub-shaped vehicle encased in a cage -- Caldwell echoed a sentiment shared by many in his squad: "They're kicking a dead horse here. The Iraqi army can't stand up on their own."...

***

"The general feeling among us is we're not really doing anything here," Caldwell said. "We clear one neighborhood, then another one fires up. It's an ongoing battle. It never ends."

"We're constantly being told that it's not our fight. It is their fight," said Sgt. Jose Reynoso, 24, of Yuma, Ariz., speaking of the Iraqi army. "But that's not the case. Whenever we go and ask them for guys, they almost always say no, and we have to do the job ourselves."...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/11/AR2007011102219.html?nav=most_emailed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ok is it me or am I getting yet another deja vu moment to
Nam?

US troops complained in '67 and '68 that they got to go off on patrol while the Southern Vientamese army staid behind the wire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. This must be so frustrating for them
God help them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is nothing like Viet Nam.
This is the worst debacle in the history of the US. In fact, it's the worst debacle in the history of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed. The situation is far more desperate.....
than it ever was in Vietnam. I have talked to Vietnam veterans who served multiple tours. They all agree that thru the Vietnam war US personell could visit towns and cities in the South when off duty with some precautions.

At the current stage of the Iraq war any american or european caught outside the green zone without an armed platoon for defence is a dead man. As far as I know this level of stay on base or die never was prevalent in Vietnam. You cannot govern from inside a tank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC