Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby's revenge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:14 PM
Original message
Libby's revenge
excerpt:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christy-hardin-smith/libby-trial-openings-an_b_39432.html

...Additional witnesses who share in this blame are, in no particular order: the CIA, which Wells characterized as "incompetent;" Ari Fleischer, who apparently pleaded the Fifth and refused to testify before the Grand Jury without an immunity waiver to protect himself from incrimination with his testimony (look for this to be a big point of contention on cross examination when Fleischer testifies); every journalist with whom Libby had contact, and especially the entire reporting staff at NBC and MSNBC, and also Matt Cooper and Judy Miller, whose ability to recall any details was described as fuzzy and muddled. (So much for thanks from Team Libby for Judy, I'm afraid.)

Two amusing points today: Wells described Don Imus as "the guy with the cowboy hat." Repeatedly. (That ought to make for some amusing morning radio blather.) And Wells characterized Libby's call to Tim Russert to exert pressure on Chris Matthews' Hardball coverage of Dick Cheney as a simple "viewer complaint." Because, you know, every viewer gets to talk directly with Tim Russert when they call to voice a concern -- it wasn't the power of the office of the Vice President which got him straight to the Washington News Bureau Chief's phone line. Nope. Not at all.

One of the issues that became very clear as Wells' opening droned on today is that Vice President Cheney's office has been operating as a second National Security apparatus -- if not the pre-eminent one, over and above what Condeleeza Rice had been running at the time -- because of the high level national security decisions that were being made, pushed, and countermanded through what the Vice President was ordering Libby to disseminate to the media on his behalf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's singing like a canary, and on the trial's FIRST day!
Edited on Wed Jan-24-07 01:27 PM by MookieWilson
You think Bush will pardon him citing "national security?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. bush won't get the chance...if this trial keeps unraveling, uncle
darth cheney will be forced to resign...then onto impeaching bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. for all the Colin Powell lovers... when is he going to step up to the plate
Edited on Wed Jan-24-07 01:32 PM by nashville_brook
and tell the TRUTH about the Cheney reign?

not that there's any CP-love here on DU -- but out in the world, for some stupid reason, otherwise intelligent Dems think Powell is an "honest statesman." i've heard from more than one Dem say that they'd vote for him for prez.

it makes me dizzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. CP for prez? I'm stunned any Dem would put his name forth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC