Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LINDORFF: Congress can stop Iran War before it starts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 05:43 PM
Original message
LINDORFF: Congress can stop Iran War before it starts
Although I strongly disagree, I can see why Congress is hesitant to cut off funding for the Iraq War. They don't want to be accused of not supporting the troops, and Bush would leave them there until every last bullet was shot rather than pull them out and give up control of the oil spigot for his cronies.

Barring Bush from attacking Iran and denying funding for that attack should have no downside with voters right now--but it might piss off some oil companies and defense contractors who were looking to get their hands on even more oil and profit from even more carnage respectively.

Tell your congressmen and senators to pass a resolution barring an attack on Iran and funding for any more Bush wars beyond Iraq. If you don't tell them what to do, someone else will who speaks a little louder and flashes some cash.

Find your congressman:

http://www.house.gov

Find your senators:

http://senate.gov




http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0201-20.htm

Published on Thursday, February 1, 2007 by CommonDreams.org

This is like Hitler's Suicide Order from the Bunker


by Dave Lindorff


http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0201-20.htm

I wrote last September that Bush was gearing up for war with Iran, as evidenced by the moving up of the deployment date of the carrier group headed by the recently re-fueled and re-armed USS Eisenhower, some of whose crewmembers had leaked that its mission was to attack Iran.

***

Now, four months later, it is widely assumed in Europe that the U.S. is planning to attack Iran, and even in the U.S., members of Congress are openly talking about their concern that Bush is planning to attack Iran.

***

Iran, meanwhile, poses no immediate threat to the U.S. But it does have a huge, battle-hardened army, much better equipped than Saddam Hussein's rag-tag troops, and equipped with some very sophisticated weaponry courtesy of Russia and China. Any U.S. forces that went into Iran could expect to take heavy casualties, and could hardly hope to conquer a nation with a population bigger than Iraq and Afghanistan combined - a population that, unlike Iraq's - can be expected to rise as one against a US invasion.

***

Iran is the second largest oil producing country in the world, and it borders the entire eastern shore of the Persian Gulf, through which a third of the world's oil passes every year. If it was attacked, all of Iran's oil, and most of the oil produced by Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, would be taken out of circulation indefinitely. Oil prices would soar way past $100/barrel, and maybe past $200 a barrel, causing a U.S. and a global depression.

****

If Senators and Representatives pass a resolution barring the use of any military forces against Iran, or the expenditure of any funds for war against Iran, Bush will not be able to push the country over the precipice.
American military leaders would have reason to ignore any orders that would put them in violation of the law of the land.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds easy enough, doesn't it?
I hope that is all it takes,truly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who thinks if Congress said NO... he wouldn't find a "defense" reason
Americans, (those who couldn't wrap their head around the concept that an American President would plan a false flag attack) would gather to support him/Admin/troops... because (we) were "attacked" and we had no other choice.

Now if it's done before Congress says NO... then he wouldn't have to bother with such a "perfect" incident... it would be, they struck us for eh eh eh... because they didn't like us capturing and killing Iranians in Iraq that were "supplying" our enemy there. btw.. that was already stated, and it's already being pounded to us here in the msm. They most likely will do it this way, it's WAY easier, and they know we have to go through red tape to get a formal NO. I bet they believe we are out of time IMO. And I bet they are right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think he'll get 9/11 level support for another terrorist attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC