Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why The White Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchal Culture Won't Be Toppled Any Time Soon (Mickey Z.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 10:22 AM
Original message
Why The White Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchal Culture Won't Be Toppled Any Time Soon (Mickey Z.)
Top Ten Reasons Why the White Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchal Culture (WSCPC) Will Not be Toppled Any Time Soon

Mickey Z. -- World News Trust

1. The "average American" (AvAm) believes in the two-party/land of opportunity/god's country scam.

2. The AvAm is too busy "just getting by" to worry about the WSCPC.

3. Not tonight, "American Idol" is on.

4. Now is not the time; we've got evil-doers to kill, goddammit.

5. What passes for dissent usually involves asking permission to hold a sign in a predetermined "free speech zone" for a few hours on a Saturday afternoon.

more

http://www.worldnewstrust.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=923&Itemid=9999
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. They stole this country fair and square from the Indians
perhaps it's time for the Indians to take it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. they win nada...
i think it's dimly penetrating the thick skulled yahoos that the wild bull they riding best be calmed down and relaxed, but they gotta use spurs to keep the thing standing up/moving, they need to blinker it or it see the huge mess it's in! they eventuallty must kill the wild bull or it tear them, their families, their friends, their neighbors, their 'classmates', indeed anyone who looks or smell like them, to bloody pieces...
bring it on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wanted to recommend this thread based on the title alone. LOL!
Last night I was watching this forbidden show on the History channel. It was about finding the missing link. Basically, it explained how Neanderthals and "Modern Man" co-habitated the planet. How they branched off, migrated, then criss-crossed in Europe. And, finally, how Neanderthal man, who was referred to as one of the most successful species known on earth because of its longevity and its ability to survive during some of the roughest times known on earth, were wiped out by "Modern Man."

And that's what it's all about. Modern Man is about wiping out all competition. And that's what is happening now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. native americans were NOT "native" - they came here from somehwere else just like
all other varieties of humans.

I be the animals and plants thought the continent was a paradise until the first human showed up.

oops, there goes the neighborhood.

Msongs
www.msongs.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Native Americans seemed to coexist with nature a lot better than the European exploiters did...
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. and that's the truth, said Edith Ann

white men have a thing about nature. I've noticed they hate mature trees and plants and feel compelled to trim them or cut them down completely.

anal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. The Original Immigrants First Wiped Out Mammoths and Other Large Species
Edited on Sun Feb-04-07 02:08 PM by Demeter
before evolving a sustainable hunter/gatherer culture.

There are scientific correlations between the appearance of men in America and the extinction of many a species:

http://www.dbc.uci.edu/~sustain/bio65/lec04/b65lec04.htm

And here's an opposing hypothesis:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/10/011025072315.htm


And Wikipedia has a contrast and compare entry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Pleistocene_Extinctions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And the Native Americans were here AT LEAST 15,000 years before
the Europeans showed up, and most likely longer, as the latest archeological findings suggest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Don't let facts
get in the way of your bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. MIckey's rants are amusing more than anything else
Be nice if he did some better ones though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. For those interested in the development of Colonial British America, I highly recommend
Jack Green's works. He traces how the earliest settlers were basicly itenerant fishermen and pine loggers on the North Atlantic coast, then the settler colonies came to pass, first Jamestown, a true exploitation colony based on the desire to get there to thwart France and Spain and to extract any gold/silver/timber/pine tar, etc. possible, which then when little was found, turned into cash crop economy with chattel slavery and indentureship at its base. Note that chattel slavery had passed out of Engish law long before and had to be "reinvented" on a new model, while indentureship was a long standing European tradition.

Even New England, with its nominal "lofty" purposes was founded by a group of self-selected "wingnuts" who weren't safe in Anglican pre-Revolution England, yet tried their damnest to recreate a literal New England with property rights unknown to the folk they found dwelling amongst them, in which traditional rights to usage were not permanent, but based upon tribal council and fluid in scope and location.

The majority of First Nations were not nomadic, but semi-sedentary, with new villages being moved as the soil was becoming played out and the hunting of game spent in one location and as populations grew. Thus, a band needed a large area of land for a cycle of agriculture and hunting, then leaving it fallow for a spell of time and advancing onward within their historic range.

Nomadic First Nations such as the Plains tribes on horseback, killing buffalo were a novelty, invented by Great Lakes wanderers and possible only by introduction of the horse from the Spanish, French and English.
Nor did most people live in the deep forest -- surrounded by it, but not in it! Land was cleared and burnt to open up hunting paths and encourage new growth for deer and for farming. Thus we have the "Old Fields" of the Cherokee who had a historic memory of their origins in the area prior to living memory.

The problem was that one could not be semi-sedentary and use British common law as a guide for life! The clash was fueled by an Indian desire for advanced European technology and the British absolute belief that the Indians were savages who did not have any rights, since they weren't Christian and did not "improve" their land, leaving it available morally, under their reasoning.

Frankly, they did not talk.

Dialog was stilted, since the paradigms of each group was so varied in what each meant when they stated something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC