Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why We Love to Hate Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:53 AM
Original message
Why We Love to Hate Hillary
By Jack Hitt, Mother Jones
http://www.alternet.org/story/46237/


"Hillary Clinton is like our national Rorschach: She stokes our every emotion, from our deepest fears to our darkest hatreds."
....

"Hillary-hating is such a national pastime, for both Democrats and Republicans, that it should be its own verb: "Hillarating." "
...

"The source of the strong feelings goes all the way back to when we were introduced to her as Bill Clinton's copresident," says Nora Bredes, director of the Susan B. Anthony Center for Women's Leadership in Rochester, New York. After the health care defeat in 1993, Hillary retreated into being a wife and then a proper first lady before emerging again "as an international leader and then in the late '90s re-creating herself as a victim of his infidelity and then again stepping out as a candidate for the Senate," says Bredes. "People get uncomfortable when it's not a neat story. Is she a progressive feminist or a cautious moderate? People don't know exactly who she is, and so different reactions are almost invited."
...

"She is a Cosmo quiz of an enigma, so let's cut right to the answer key in the back pages and find out what kind of Hillary you see.:

The Martha Stewart Hillary: For you, the New York senator is, as Newt Gingrich's mother once observed, "a bitch," or, as William Safire phrased it, "a congenital liar." You tend to relish the catty details that reveal her as a petty-minded overachiever, like when she peevishly denied her ghostwriters writing credit....

The Tammy Wynette Hillary: The famous invocation of the country-western singer happened during a 60 Minutes interview in 1992. Hillary defended her husband's philandering by saying, "I'm not sitting here some little woman, standing by my man like Tammy Wynette." And this is where it can get tricky. Most people forget Hillary's next line: "I'm sitting here because I love him." The cognitive dissonance is confusing, because, of course, that is the Tammy Wynette position....

The Eleanor Roosevelt Hillary: This Hillary first emerged at her 1969 college graduation, when her commencement speech was considered so controversially feminist that it landed her in the pages of Life magazine...

The Dianne Feinstein Hillary: You see her as a phony centrist always triangulating toward the ideological middle, willing to betray her true liberal self for power.
....

The Lisa Simpson Hillary: We're seeing of lot of this conscientious Hillary lately.

The Diana Prince Hillary: Bill's wife is the secret identity of Wonder Woman. Is there anything she can't do? Even if you hate her, you admire her fundraising ability and her $8 million book advance...

The Lady Macbeth Hillary: You fixate on pictures of Hillary wearing big dark sunglasses, behind which she conspires to take over the world.

------

I recommend reading this whole article - the gist of it is that sexism plays a big role in people's attitude toward Hillary. even liberals and democrats.

I was discussing Hillary Clinton with a feminist friend of mine recently, and the thing that bothered her the most about Hillary, which she couldn't let go of, was the question " Why didn't she leave Bill after the Monica thing?"

I'n not a big fan of Hillary, but this article made me rethink some of my own criticisms of her and what lies beneath it.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sexism? Well then here's some cognitive dissonance fer ya...
I recommend reading this whole article - the gist of it is that sexism plays a big role in people's attitude toward Hillary. even liberals and democrats.

I was discussing Hillary Clinton with a feminist friend of mine recently, and the thing that bothered her the most about Hillary, which she couldn't let go of, was the question " Why didn't she leave Bill after the Monica thing?"


Isn't there something weird about those last 2 paragraphs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Uh, not really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I just wish to see all new people run. I am sick of these same people
Give us all a brake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. she ran before?
I guess I missed it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. No but it is the same old people in office.
You know wife of this one, son of that and they all seem to be just stealing us blind. I would just like to see a whole new group of people and hope for some better than we have had. It is just a dream I guess as I am sure power is like sex and greed. It goes to DC and does well in that place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Nope.
We have demands of Hillary we would NEVER make on a man.

Of course, I've never had any problem understanding why she stayed with her brilliant bad boy.

Someone here at DU called Hillary "heartless." Nope. A heartless woman could not have raised Chelsea Clinton.

But she is ambitious. And I believe ambition brought about the pro-IWR vote for those 28 senators who disappointed us. BUT WE AIN'T GETTING A CANDIDATE WITHOUT AMBITION. NEITHER ARE THEY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. I think pulling the gender card on this is disingenuous.
There are many, many reasons to be wary of Clinton that have nothing to do with gender.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. Mostly the same things to be wary of in the other Dem options --
with a few exceptions. However, when it's Clinton, she is consistently made out to be worse, even if she has made the same bad decisions as the other candidates.

I'm not a big fan, but there are definitely sexist undertones when most people talk about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. mmm...okay, but I know my objections to her and others have nothing
to do with gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. One Attitude Here - War Monger And Bush Enabler - Voted For War
Enough Said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, not enough said. She, and many other Democrats, voted for
Edited on Mon Feb-05-07 06:23 AM by pnwmom
the October 2003 IWR, with its compromise language, because the alternative was to watch the Republicans take over Congress in January and pass a much worse Republican-only version of the IWR -- giving Bush a free hand to attack not only Iraq, but anywhere in the Middle East.

So the real choice was: vote for the October IWR, with all its conditions, and hope that Bush would abide by them. Or help it go down to defeat -- and then, in January, watch the Republicans pass a new IWR (one that wouldn't require even a single vote from a Democrat) giving Bush a blank check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. And That's The Reason I Will Not Vote For Anyone That Voted For War
Enough Said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. What's the reason? Because their Oct. vote prevented an even worse IWR
from coming before a Republican-led Congress in January?

That makes a lot of sense.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. I was just watching the lead-in for Democracy Now!
Hillary giving a speech to AIPAC over the week-end, and refusing to rule out a strike on Iran.

'Nuff said. Screw Hillary, and anybody else, male or female who backs an attack on Iran.

And just for the record, John Edwards, who would have gotten my support, just blew it with that same line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. corporatist..
how's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
26. You're right - once we hit on WAR MONGER, further extrapolation is pointless n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not as good as Al Gore or Dennis Kucinich n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. yep, agreed.
and welcome to DU! :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Thanks for the welcome...
I have been here for years, I just don't have the time or inclination to post very much.

Nice to meet you...See you around the board.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwlauren35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. But why use the word "WHORE"???
It's not generally a word we use to describe men in politics.

I've heard some pretty mysogynistic words in DU, and they always make me squirm. I hate seeing Rice get called "whore", I hate seeing Clinton get called a "whore". There have to be other words... aren't there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Because when you sell yourself to the highest bidder, that is what you are...A WHORE
Painful words for painful deeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. How childish... Enough said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Thank you, qulauren35. It is a misogynistic term, though
many DU'ers will deny it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. Jist for the record, I refer to many, especially DLC dems, as whores.
These include Biden, 2 Nelsons, and a few others. Is that misogynistic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Oh yeah, she's "Repub lite" with one of the most liberal voting records
in the Senate. That's quite a feat.

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. On the issues that matter to me, she is bought and paid for
We need leadership on the war, and she is beholden to AIPAC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, And I Dislike Bush Because I'm A Misandrist
Yeah, that's the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. actually, that would be misanthrope, I think
but hey, whadddeye know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I Believe That A Misanthrope Hates All People
While a misandrist hates men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. ah. I stand corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. can't we have a NON DLC/lieberman/hawkish/ corporatist candidate?
I mean, I don't approve of Edwards talking tough on Iran, either. Doesn't that make me an equal opportunity disapprover?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. Sexism? No. Unless Biden is a woman too and I missed that somehow?
I won't support her in the primaries for the same reason I won't support Biden. War, war, war. She had a chance to say something years ago. She has chances to do something now. She didn't and doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. Sounds Like a Load of You Know What, To ME!
I hate Hillary because she is wasting her talent and her powerful position of privilege to further pervert, subvert, and destroy this nation, the world, and the whole concept of democracy.

I would LOVE to love Hillary--I did, back in the early days. But knowing now what she's been doing lately, all I can say is, "Get thee behind me, Satan!" She is offering fool's gold, her own brand of Koolaid, and I ain't buying, and neither are a lot of other, once bitten, twice shy people.

To have the first woman be the WRONG woman would be infinitely worse than having NO woman in the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
28. When people use words like "whore" to describe Sen. Clinton,
that's a very clear mark of underlying sexism -- conscious or unconscious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Agreed. They truly are showing their ugly ass.
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. perhaps, but I've seen them refer to holy joe lieberman in the same way
I think it refers more to their perceived behavior (selling themselves out in an unsavory way) than gender.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
32. If you find her boring and unimaginative, does that make you sexist?
She looks like a mediocre political hack to me. Nothing to do with her gender.

In fairness, there are lots of people that hyperventilate over her name, but mostly because they listen to Limbaugh and the like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorbal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
33. Watch out for this new reframing of Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crud76 Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
40. She Just Happens To Be
female...

"The Dianne Feinstein Hillary: You see her as a phony centrist always triangulating toward the ideological middle, willing to betray her true liberal self for power."

...there are a couple of male Democrats I could name who fit this description - some of them are running for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC