Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Douglas J. Feith: Tough questions we were right to ask (yeah right)...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dEMOK Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:13 AM
Original message
Douglas J. Feith: Tough questions we were right to ask (yeah right)...
Douglas J. Feith: Tough questions we were right to ask
By Douglas J. Feith -
Published 12:00 am PST Thursday, February 15, 2007


Promoters of the "Bush Lied, People Died" line claim that the recent Pentagon inspector general's report concerning my former office's work on Iraq intelligence supports their cause. What the IG actually said is a different story.

The IG, Thomas Gimble, focused on a single Pentagon briefing from 2002 -- a critique of the CIA's work on the Iraq-al-Qaida relationship.

His report concluded that the work my office generated was entirely lawful and authorized, and that Sen. Carl Levin was wrong to allege that we misled Congress.

Gimble made Levin happy, however, by calling the Pentagon briefing "inappropriate," a word the senator has whipped into a political lather. At issue is a simple but critical question: whether policy officials should be free to raise questions about CIA work. In Gimble's opinion, apparently, the answer is no. I disagree.

The CIA has a hard job. Some of its work has been good; some has been famously and disastrously bad, as everyone familiar with the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction fiasco knows. Intelligence is inherently sketchy and speculative -- and historically often wrong. It is improved when policy officials freely probe and challenge it -- http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/123596.html...


(Feith consciously fed Cheney the faulty intel Cheney wanted -- regardless of the fact that the CIA & FBI found no basis for invading Iraq).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Feith's Trial Would Be One I Would Happily Serve As A Juror On
What an arrogant ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dEMOK Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Feith Will Go Down as...
...one of America's greatest traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I Doubt We Will Even Remember His Name
after Bush, Cheney, Rummy, Rice, Wolfowitz, Powell and the rest are convicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lie, on top of lie, on top of lie. This guy just never quits, does he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. The SOB has been underground for many months
Edited on Thu Feb-15-07 05:57 AM by Gman
haven't seen his name in print for a long time. The sorry SOB feels the heat from Levin and he sees Libby's ass frying and now he's scrambling to get his cover story out. That's his story and he's sticking to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. note the collective 'we"


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/13/AR2007021301092.html
> Tough Questions We Were Right to Ask
>
> By Douglas J. Feith
> Wednesday, February 14, 2007; Page A19
>
> Promoters of the "Bush Lied, People Died" line claim that the recent Pentagon inspector general's report concerning my former office's work on Iraq intelligence supports their cause. What the IG actually said is a different story.
>
> The IG, Thomas Gimble, focused on a single Pentagon briefing from 2002 -- a critique of the CIA's work on the Iraq-al-Qaeda relationship. His report concluded that the work my office generated was entirely lawful and authorized, and that Sen. Carl Levin was wrong to allege that we misled Congress.
>
> Gimble made Levin happy, however, by calling the Pentagon briefing "inappropriate," a word the senator has whipped into a political lather. At issue is a simple but critical question: whether policy officials should be free to raise questions about CIA work. In Gimble's opinion, apparently, the answer is no. I disagree.
>
> The CIA has a hard job. Some of its work has been good; some has been famously and disastrously bad, as everyone familiar with the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction fiasco knows. Intelligence is inherently sketchy and speculative -- and historically often wrong. It is improved when policy officials freely probe and challenge it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. What is Feith's job description and does it include intelligence work?
Job description below

Douglas J. Feith is the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. His responsibilities include the formulation of defense planning guidance and forces policy, Department of Defense relations with foreign countries and the Department’s role in U.S. Government interagency policy making
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC